CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71Membrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesExtraction and Separation ProcessesMine drainage and remediation techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of selectrodialysis for the removal of As from metallurgical process waters: Recovery of Cu and Zn

Open access
Reig, M., Vecino, X., Valderrama, C., Gibert, O., Cortina, J.L.·2018·Separation and Purification Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.040
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.040

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In SED, divalent anions and cations are rejected by the MAEMs and MCEMs.

    “The divalent anions ( SO4 2 -) and cations (Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ ) are rejected by the MAEMs and MCEMs (Lambert et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2012; Reig et al.,”

    From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Reig et al., 2018

  • SED employs monovalent anion exchange membranes and monovalent cation exchange membranes to transport monovalent anions and cations through them to the anode and cathode, respectively.

    “SED employs monovalent anion exchange membranes (MAEMs) and monovalent cation exchange membranes (MCEMs) to transport the monovalent anions (Cl -) and cations (Li + , Na + , and K + ) through the MAEMs and MCEMS and to the anode and cathode, respectively.”

    From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Reig et al., 2018

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Hansen, 2016, A new process for sustainable wastewater treatment in Chilean copper smelters, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., 5, 159
  2. Kurniawan, 2006, Physico-chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals, Chem. Eng. J., 118, 83, 10.1016/j.cej.2006.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Fu, 2011, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 407, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhao, 2016, New trends in removing heavy metals from wastewater, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 100, 6509, 10.1007/s00253-016-7646-x · DOI
  5. Al-Saydeh, 2017, Copper removal from industrial wastewater: a comprehensive review, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 56, 35, 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.026 · DOI
  6. Alvarez, 2007, Precipitation of Zn(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) at bench-scale using biogenic hydrogen sulfide from the utilization of volatile fatty acids, Chemosphere, 66, 1677, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.065 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2009, Precipitation of heavy metals from wastewater using simulated flue gas: sequent additions of fly ash, lime and carbon dioxide, Water Res., 43, 2605, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.007 · DOI
  8. Chiang, 2012, Adsorption of multi-heavy metals onto water treatment residuals: sorption capacities and applications, Chem. Eng. J., 200–202, 405, 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.070 · DOI
  9. Caprarescu, 2015, San copolymer membranes with ion exchangers for Cu(II) removal from synthetic wastewater by electrodialysis, J. Environ. Sci. (China), 35, 27, 10.1016/j.jes.2015.02.005 · DOI
  10. Cifuentes, 2002, On the electrodialysis of aqueous H2SO4–CuSO4 electrolytes with metallic impurities, J. Memb. Sci., 207, 1, 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00733-5 · DOI
  11. Cifuentes, 2004, Advances in the treatment of CuSO4-H2SO4-As-Sb-H2O solutions by electrodialysis, CIM Bull., 97, 72
  12. Cifuentes, 2004, Aspects of the development of a copper electrowinning cell based on reactive electrodialysis, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59, 1087, 10.1016/j.ces.2003.12.013 · DOI
  13. Zhang, 2012, Selectrodialysis: fractionation of divalent ions from monovalent ions in a novel electrodialysis stack, Sep. Purif. Technol., 88, 191, 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.017 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Reig, 2016, Selectrodialysis and bipolar membrane electrodialysis combination for industrial process brines treatment: monovalent-divalent ions separation and acid and base production, Desalination, 399, 88, 10.1016/j.desal.2016.08.010 · DOI
  15. Zhang, 2013, Phosphate separation and recovery from wastewater by novel electrodialysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5888, 10.1021/es4004476 · DOI
  16. Tran, 2014, P-recovery as calcium phosphate from wastewater using an integrated selectrodialysis/crystallization process, J. Clean. Prod., 77, 140, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.069 · DOI
  17. Tran, 2015, Phosphate pre-concentration from municipal wastewater by selectrodialysis: effect of competing components, Sep. Purif. Technol., 141, 38, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.017 · DOI
  18. Ghyselbrecht, 2013, Desalination of an industrial saline water with conventional and bipolar membrane electrodialysis, Desalination, 318, 9, 10.1016/j.desal.2013.03.020 · DOI
  19. Van Der Bruggen, 2004, Separation of monovalent and divalent ions from aqueous solution by electrodialysis and nanofiltration, Water Res., 38, 1347, 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.008 · DOI
  20. Zhang, 2009, Separation of nutrient ions and organic compounds from salts in RO concentrates by standard and monovalent selective ion-exchange membranes used in electrodialysis, J. Memb. Sci., 332, 104, 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.030 · DOI
  21. Strathmann, 2010, Electrodialysis, a mature technology with a multitude of new applications, Desalination, 264, 268, 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.069 · DOI
  22. Reig, 2016, Integration of monopolar and bipolar electrodialysis for valorization of seawater reverse osmosis desalination brines: production of strong acid and base, Desalination, 398, 87, 10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.024 · DOI
  23. Reig, 2016, Integration of nanofiltration and bipolar electrodialysis for valorization of seawater desalination brines: production of drinking and waste water treatment chemicals, Desalination, 382, 13, 10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.013 · DOI
  24. Buffle, 2007, Metal flux and dynamic speciation at (bio)interfaces. Part I: Critical evaluation and compilation of physicochemical parameters for complexes with simple ligands and fulvic/humic substances, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 7609, 10.1021/es070702p · DOI
  25. Tanaka, 2013, The difference of diffusion coefficients in water for arsenic compounds at various pH and its dominant factors implied by molecular simulations, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 105, 360, 10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.004 · DOI
  26. Velizarova, 2002, A comparative study on Cu, Cr and As removal from CCA-treated wood waste by dialytic and electrodialytic processes, J. Hazard. Mater., 94, 147, 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00063-8 · DOI
  27. Mohammadi, 2004, Separation of copper ions by electrodialysis using Taguchi experimental design, Desalination, 169, 21, 10.1016/j.desal.2004.08.004 · DOI
  28. Juang, 2000, Metal removal from aqueous solutions using chitosan-enhanced membrane filtration, J. Memb. Sci., 165, 159, 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00235-5 · DOI
  29. Landaburu-Aguirre, 2009, The removal of zinc from synthetic wastewaters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: statistical design of experiments, Desalination, 240, 262, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.077 · DOI
  30. Ujang, 1996, Application of low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane for Zn2+ and Cu2+ removal from wastewater, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 247, 10.2166/wst.1996.0223 · DOI
  31. Qdais, 2004, Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: a comparative study, Desalination, 164, 105, 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00169-9 · DOI
  32. Figoli, 2010, Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration, Water Res., 44, 97, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.007 · DOI
  33. Peng, 2011, Recovery of copper and water from copper-electroplating wastewater by the combination process of electrolysis and electrodialysis, J. Hazard. Mater., 189, 814, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reig, M., Vecino, X., Valderrama, C., Gibert, O., & Cortina, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
  • Centro Tecnológico del Agua (ES)
Corresponding author
Reig, M.
ORCID
Venue
Separation and Purification Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
195
Pages
404-412
ISSN
1383-5866 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.040
OpenAlex
W2781098300
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Separation and Purification Technology (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the Catalan Government
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Keywords
arsenic removal, copper recovery, zinc recovery, acidic streams, chemical speciation, copper sulfate, zinc sulfate, energy consumption, mining wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review