The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image dehazing by artificial multiple-exposure image fusion
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Bad weather conditions can reduce visibility on images acquired outdoors, decreasing their visual quality. The image processing task concerned with the mitigation of this effect is known as image dehazing. In this paper we present a new image dehazing technique that can remove the visual degradation due to haze without relying on the inversion of a physical model of haze formation, but respecting its main underlying assumptions. Hence, the proposed technique avoids the need of estimating depth in the scene, as well as costly depth map refinement processes. To achieve this goal, the original hazy image is first artificially under-exposed by means of a sequence of gamma-correction operations. The resulting set of multiply-exposed images is merged into a haze-free result through a multi-scale Laplacian blending scheme. A detailed experimental evaluation is presented in terms of both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The obtained results indicate that the fusion of artificially under-exposed images can effectively remove the effect of haze, even in challenging situations where other current image dehazing techniques fail to produce good-quality results. An implementation of the technique is open-sourced for reproducibility ( https://github.com/agaldran/amef_dehazing ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
(1995) · Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466933 · Cited by 12,860
Single image haze removal using dark channel prior
He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.168 · Cited by 7,601
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
(2017) · doi:10.1109/cvpr35066.2017 · Cited by 7,141
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(2009) · doi:10.1109/cvpr14067.2009 · Cited by 5,550
DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removal
Cai, B., Xu, X., Jia, K., Qing, C., & Tao, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2016.2598681 · Cited by 3,367
A Fast Single Image Haze Removal Algorithm Using Color Attenuation Prior
Zhu, Q., Mai, J., & Shao, L. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2446191 · Cited by 2,469
2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(2013) · doi:10.1109/cvpr19808.2013 · Cited by 2,396
Visibility in bad weather from a single image
Tan, R. T. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587643 · Cited by 2,280
Metadata
- Authors
- Galdran, A.
- Venue
- Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 135-147
- ISSN
- 0165-1684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792830341
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image dehazing by artificial multiple-exposure image fusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.03.008
- The paper
- Galdran, A. (2018). Image dehazing by artificial multiple-exposure image fusion. Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.03.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.