Cited by 63Chaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionComputer Science and EngineeringCryptographic Implementations and Security

An image encryption scheme using self-adaptive selective permutation and inter-intra-block feedback diffusion

Liu, Dong-dai, Zhang, Wei, Yu, Hai, Zhu, Zhi-liang·2018·Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.05.008

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large number of image encryption schemes treat the plain-image as ordinary textual data.

    “A large number of image encryption schemes just treat plain-image as an ordinary textual data [5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, D.-D., Zhang, W., Yu, H., & Zhu, Z.-L.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (CN)
ORCID
Yu, Hai
Venue
Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
151
Pages
130-143
ISSN
0165-1684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799634971
Cited by
63
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61374178, 61402092)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Keywords
image encryption, confusion, chaotic maps, differential attack resistance, statistical attack resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review