The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of lead stress on mineral content and growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea) seedlings
Open accessAbstract
Lead (Pb) is the most common heavy metal contaminant in the environment. Pb is not an essential element for plants, but they absorb it when it is present in their environment, especially in rural areas when the soil is polluted by automotive exhaust and in fields contaminated with fertilizers containing heavy metal impurities. To investigate lead effects on nutrient uptake and metabolism, two plant species, spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and wheat (Triticum aestivum), were grown under hydroponic conditions and stressed with lead nitrate, Pb(NO3)2, at three concentrations (1.5, 3, and 15 mM). Lead is accumulated in a dose-dependent manner in both plant species, which results in reduced growth and lower uptake of all mineral ions tested. Total amounts and concentrations of most mineral ions (Na, K, Ca, P, Mg, Fe, Cu and Zn) are reduced, although Mn concentrations are increased, as its uptake is reduced less relative to the whole plant's growth. The deficiency of mineral nutrients correlates in a strong decrease in the contents of chlorophylls a and b and proline in both species, but these effects are less pronounced in spinach than in wheat. By contrast, the effects of lead on soluble proteins differ between species; they are reduced in wheat at all lead concentrations, whereas they are increased in spinach, where their value peaks at 3 mM Pb. The relative lead uptake by spinach and wheat, and the different susceptibility of these two species to lead treatment are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00018060 · Cited by 20,967
Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation
HUANG, J. W., & CUNNINGHAM, S. D. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01147.x · Cited by 622
Cited by
Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals
Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Mathew, B. B., & Beeregowda, K. N. (2014) · Interdisciplinary Toxicology · doi:10.2478/intox-2014-0009 · Cited by 6,402
Plant-lead interactions: Transport, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification mechanisms
Kumar, A., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.113 · Cited by 282
20-Hydroxyecdysone protects wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) against lead stress
Lamhamdi, M., Lafont, R., Rharrabe, K., Sayah, F., Aarab, A., & Bakrim, A. (2016) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.11.006 · Cited by 18
Lamhamdi, M., Bakrim, A., Bouayad, N., Aarab, A., & Lafont, R. (2013) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1755-1 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamhamdi, M., El Galiou, O., Bakrim, A., Nóvoa-Muñoz, J. C., Arias-Estévez, M., Aarab, A., & Lafont, R.
- Venue
- Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-36
- ISSN
- 1319-562X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077176219
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of lead stress on mineral content and growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea) seedlings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.09.001
- The paper
- Lamhamdi, M., El Galiou, O., Bakrim, A., Nóvoa-Muñoz, J. C., Arias-Estévez, M., Aarab, A., & Lafont, R. (2013). Effect of lead stress on mineral content and growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea) seedlings. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.09.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.