The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 166 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant-lead interactions: Transport, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification mechanisms
Abstract
Natural and human activities introduced an excess level of toxic lead (Pb) to the environment. Pb has no known biological significance and its interactions with plants lead to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Pb and/or ROS have the potential to cause phytotoxicity by damaging the tissue ultrastructure, cellular components, and biomolecules. These damaging effects may possibly result in the inhibition of normal cellular functioning, physiological reactions, and overall plant performances. ROS play a dual role and act as a signaling molecule in plant defense system. This system encircles enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidative mechanisms. Catalase, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and enzymes from the ascorbate-glutathione cycle are the major enzymatic antioxidants, while non-enzymatic antioxidants include phenols, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and glutathione. Pb removal from contaminated sites using plants depend on the plant's Pb accumulation capacity, Pb-induced phytotoxicity, and tolerance and detoxification mechanisms plants adopted to combat against this phytotoxicity. However, the consolidated information discussing Pb-plant interaction including Pb uptake and its translocation within tissues, Pb-mediated phytotoxic symptoms, antioxidative mechanisms, cellular, and protein metabolisms are rather limited. Thus, we aimed to present a consolidated information and critical discussions focusing on the recent studies related to the Pb-induced toxicity and oxidative stress situations in different plants. The important functions of different antioxidants in plants during Pb stress have been reviewed. Additionally, tolerance responses and detoxification mechanisms in the plant through the regulation of gene expression, and glutathione and protein metabolisms to compete against Pb-induced phytotoxicity are also briefly discussed herein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review
Nagajyoti, P. C., Lee, K. D., & Sreekanth, T. V. M. (2010) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8 · Cited by 3,962
Chemical studies of anthocyanins: A review
Castañeda-Ovando, A., Pacheco-Hernández, M. D. L., Páez-Hernández, M. E., Rodríguez, J. A., & Galán-Vidal, C. A. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.001 · Cited by 2,552
Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting
Rascio, N., & Navari-Izzo, F. (2011) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016 · Cited by 2,012
The Haber–Weiss reaction and mechanisms of toxicity
Kehrer, J. P. (2000) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00231-6 · Cited by 1,418
Sharma, S. S., & Dietz, K.-J. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erj073 · Cited by 1,374
Heavy Metal Tolerance in Plants: Role of Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Ionomics
Singh, S., Parihar, P., Singh, R., Singh, V. P., & Prasad, S. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.01143 · Cited by 1,318
Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants
Verbruggen, N., Hermans, C., & Schat, H. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02748.x · Cited by 1,066
Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation
Rajkumar, M., Sandhya, S., Prasad, M. N. V., & Freitas, H. (2012) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.04.011 · Cited by 992
Self-citationLead Uptake, Toxicity, and Detoxification in Plants
Pourrut, B., Shahid, M., Dumat, C., Winterton, P., & Pinelli, E. (2011) · Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9860-6_4 · Cited by 937
How relevant are flavonoids as antioxidants in plants?
Hernández, I., Alegre, L., Van Breusegem, F., & Munné-Bosch, S. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.12.003 · Cited by 703
Cited by
Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12885 · Cited by 1,090
Cadmium stress in plants: A critical review of the effects, mechanisms, and tolerance strategies
El Rasafi, T., Oukarroum, A., Haddioui, A., Song, H., Kwon, E. E., Bolan, N., Tack, F. M. G., Sebastian, A., Prasad, M. N. V., & Rinklebe, J. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2020.1835435 · Cited by 601
Self-citationOmics approaches for understanding heavy metal responses and tolerance in plants
Jamla, M., Khare, T., Joshi, S., Patil, S., Penna, S., & Kumar, V. (2021) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100213 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, A., & Prasad, M. N. V.
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 401-418
- ISSN
- 0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895439103
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 166
- FWCI
- 16.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant-lead interactions: Transport, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.113
- The paper
- Kumar, A., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2018). Plant-lead interactions: Transport, toxicity, tolerance, and detoxification mechanisms. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.