Cited by 37Cell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAI in cancer detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

deepOrganoid: A brightfield cell viability model for screening matrix-embedded organoids

Open access

Abstract

High-throughput viability screens are commonly used in the identification and development of chemotherapeutic drugs. These systems rely on the fidelity of the cellular model systems to recapitulate the drug response that occurs in vivo. In recent years, there has been an expansion in the utilization of patient-derived materials as well as advanced cell culture techniques, such as multi-cellular tumor organoids, to further enhance the translational relevance of cellular model systems. Simple quantitative analysis remains a challenge, primarily due to the difficulties of robust image segmentation in heterogenous 3D cultures. However, explicit segmentation is not required with the advancement of deep learning, and it can be used for both continuous (regression) or categorical classification problems. Deep learning approaches are additionally benefited by being fully data-driven and highly automatable, thus they can be established and run with minimal to no user-defined parameters. In this article, we describe the development and implementation of a regressive deep learning model trained on brightfield images of patient-derived organoids and use the terminal viability readout (CellTiter-Glo) as training labels. Ultimately, this has led to the generation of a non-invasive and label-free tool to evaluate changes in organoid viability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.slasd.2022.03.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Gray, 2015, Large-scale drug screens support precision medicine, Cancer Discov, 5, 1130, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0945 · DOI
  2. Shoemaker, 2006, The NCI60 human tumor cell line anticancer drug screen, Nat Rev Cancer, 6, 813, 10.1038/nrc1951 · DOI
  3. Jacobi, 2017, Organotypic three-dimensional cancer cell cultures mirror drug responses in vivo–Lessons learned from the inhibition of EGFR signaling, Oncotarget, 8, 107423, 10.18632/oncotarget.22475 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kimlin, 2013, In vitro three-dimensional (3D) models in cancer research–An update, Mol Carcinog, 52, 167, 10.1002/mc.21844 · DOI
  5. Phan, 2019, A simple high-throughput approach identifies actionable drug sensitivities in patient-derived tumor organoids, Commun Biol, 2, 78, 10.1038/s42003-019-0305-x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Zhao, 2021, Morphological screening of mesenchymal mammary tumor organoids to identify drugs that reverse epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Nat Commun, 12, 4262, 10.1038/s41467-021-24545-3 · DOI
  7. Borten, 2018, Automated brightfield morphometry of 3D organoid populations by OrganoSeg, Sci Rep, 8, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-18815-8 · DOI
  8. Booij, 2019, 3D cell-based assays for drug screens–Challenges in imaging, image analysis, and high-content analysis, SLAS discov, 24, 615, 10.1177/2472555219830087 · DOI
  9. Di, 2014, Ultra high content image analysis and phenotype profiling of 3D cultured micro-tissues, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688 · DOI
  10. Rançon, 2019, Comparison of SIFT encoded and deep learning features for the classification and detection of Esca disease in Bordeaux vineyards, Remote Sens, 11, 1, 10.3390/rs11010001 · DOI
  11. Simonyan, 2014, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, J arXiv preprint
  12. Kandaswamy, 2016, High-content analysis of breast cancer using single-cell deep transfer learning, J Biomol Screen, 21, 252, 10.1177/1087057115623451 · DOI
  13. Kensert, 2019, Transfer learning with deep convolutional neural networks for classifying cellular morphological changes, SLAS Discov, 24, 466, 10.1177/2472555218818756 · DOI
  14. Wang, P, Yao, W. Weakly supervised pseudo-label assisted learning for ALS point cloud semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01919 (2021). · arXiv
  15. Zuo, 2017, Metastasis regulation by PPARD expression in cancer cells, JCI Insight, 2, 10.1172/jci.insight.91419 · DOI
  16. Liu, 2020, Suppression of membranous LRP5 recycling, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and colon carcinogenesis by 15-LOX-1 peroxidation of linoleic acid in PI3P, Cell Rep, 32, 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108049 · DOI
  17. Hafner, 2016, Growth rate inhibition metrics correct for confounders in measuring sensitivity to cancer drugs, Nat Methods, 13, 521, 10.1038/nmeth.3853 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Powell, R. T., Moussalli, M. J., Guo, L., Bae, G., Singh, P., Stephan, C., Shureiqi, I., & Davies, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University System (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Powell, Reid T.
Venue
SLAS Discovery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
175-184
ISSN
2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220666006
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150578, RP170719, RP200668)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
organoids, cell viability, bright-field microscopy, deep learning, regression models, patient-derived organoids, 3D cell culture, image segmentation, drug screening, chemotherapy response
MeSH terms
Cell Survival, Humans, Organoids, Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review