The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
deepOrganoid: A brightfield cell viability model for screening matrix-embedded organoids
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput viability screens are commonly used in the identification and development of chemotherapeutic drugs. These systems rely on the fidelity of the cellular model systems to recapitulate the drug response that occurs in vivo. In recent years, there has been an expansion in the utilization of patient-derived materials as well as advanced cell culture techniques, such as multi-cellular tumor organoids, to further enhance the translational relevance of cellular model systems. Simple quantitative analysis remains a challenge, primarily due to the difficulties of robust image segmentation in heterogenous 3D cultures. However, explicit segmentation is not required with the advancement of deep learning, and it can be used for both continuous (regression) or categorical classification problems. Deep learning approaches are additionally benefited by being fully data-driven and highly automatable, thus they can be established and run with minimal to no user-defined parameters. In this article, we describe the development and implementation of a regressive deep learning model trained on brightfield images of patient-derived organoids and use the terminal viability readout (CellTiter-Glo) as training labels. Ultimately, this has led to the generation of a non-invasive and label-free tool to evaluate changes in organoid viability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“PDOs are a validated preclinical model to evaluate anti-cancer drug efficacy [24,25].”
From Combining Mitomycin C with inhibition of BAD phosphorylation enhances apoptotic cell death in advanced cervical cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Development of a miniaturized 3D organoid culture platform for ultra-high-throughput screening
Du, Y., Li, X., Niu, Q., Mo, X., Qui, M., Ma, T., Kuo, C. J., & Fu, H. (2020) · Journal of Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjaa036 · Cited by 125
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Gray, 2015, Large-scale drug screens support precision medicine, Cancer Discov, 5, 1130, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0945 · DOI
- Shoemaker, 2006, The NCI60 human tumor cell line anticancer drug screen, Nat Rev Cancer, 6, 813, 10.1038/nrc1951 · DOI
- Jacobi, 2017, Organotypic three-dimensional cancer cell cultures mirror drug responses in vivo–Lessons learned from the inhibition of EGFR signaling, Oncotarget, 8, 107423, 10.18632/oncotarget.22475 · DOI · Paper page
- Kimlin, 2013, In vitro three-dimensional (3D) models in cancer research–An update, Mol Carcinog, 52, 167, 10.1002/mc.21844 · DOI
- Phan, 2019, A simple high-throughput approach identifies actionable drug sensitivities in patient-derived tumor organoids, Commun Biol, 2, 78, 10.1038/s42003-019-0305-x · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, 2021, Morphological screening of mesenchymal mammary tumor organoids to identify drugs that reverse epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Nat Commun, 12, 4262, 10.1038/s41467-021-24545-3 · DOI
- Borten, 2018, Automated brightfield morphometry of 3D organoid populations by OrganoSeg, Sci Rep, 8, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-18815-8 · DOI
- Booij, 2019, 3D cell-based assays for drug screens–Challenges in imaging, image analysis, and high-content analysis, SLAS discov, 24, 615, 10.1177/2472555219830087 · DOI
- Di, 2014, Ultra high content image analysis and phenotype profiling of 3D cultured micro-tissues, PLoS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0109688 · DOI
- Rançon, 2019, Comparison of SIFT encoded and deep learning features for the classification and detection of Esca disease in Bordeaux vineyards, Remote Sens, 11, 1, 10.3390/rs11010001 · DOI
- Simonyan, 2014, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, J arXiv preprint
- Kandaswamy, 2016, High-content analysis of breast cancer using single-cell deep transfer learning, J Biomol Screen, 21, 252, 10.1177/1087057115623451 · DOI
- Kensert, 2019, Transfer learning with deep convolutional neural networks for classifying cellular morphological changes, SLAS Discov, 24, 466, 10.1177/2472555218818756 · DOI
- Wang, P, Yao, W. Weakly supervised pseudo-label assisted learning for ALS point cloud semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.01919 (2021). · arXiv
- Zuo, 2017, Metastasis regulation by PPARD expression in cancer cells, JCI Insight, 2, 10.1172/jci.insight.91419 · DOI
- Liu, 2020, Suppression of membranous LRP5 recycling, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and colon carcinogenesis by 15-LOX-1 peroxidation of linoleic acid in PI3P, Cell Rep, 32, 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108049 · DOI
- Hafner, 2016, Growth rate inhibition metrics correct for confounders in measuring sensitivity to cancer drugs, Nat Methods, 13, 521, 10.1038/nmeth.3853 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Development of an AI model for DILI-level prediction using liver organoid brightfield images
Tan, S., Ding, Y., Wang, W., Rao, J., Cheng, F., Zhang, Q., Xu, T., Hu, T., Hu, Q., Ye, Z., et al. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08205-6 · Cited by 26
Wang, L., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Ye, Q., Basappa, B., Zhu, T., Lobie, P. E., & Pandey, V. (2024) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102103 · Cited by 8
“PDOs are a validated preclinical model to evaluate anti-cancer drug efficacy [24,25].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Powell, R. T., Moussalli, M. J., Guo, L., Bae, G., Singh, P., Stephan, C., Shureiqi, I., & Davies, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University System (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Powell, Reid T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- SLAS Discovery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220666006
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150578, RP170719, RP200668)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- organoids, cell viability, bright-field microscopy, deep learning, regression models, patient-derived organoids, 3D cell culture, image segmentation, drug screening, chemotherapy response
- MeSH terms
- Cell Survival, Humans, Organoids, Cell Culture Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review