Cited by 37Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

Effect of sleep extension on sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms and driving behavior in adolescents with chronic short sleep

Open access
Garner, Annie A., Hansen, Ashley, Baxley, Catherine, Becker, Stephen P., Sidol, Craig A., Beebe, Dean W.·2017·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective/background Few adolescents report obtaining adequate amounts of sleep. Correlational studies have linked adolescent short sleep with driving crashes and sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT), a cluster of symptoms that include sluggishness and low persistence that are related to but distinct from inattention and sleepiness. The relationship between SCT and driving is understudied, and no study has experimentally examined the relationship between SCT and sleep. We examined the relationship between SCT and driving problems in a sample of chronically short-sleeping adolescents. We also examined whether experimentally extending sleep improved SCT and driving behaviors. Participants/methods Licensed 16- to 18-year-old adolescents who regularly obtained five to seven hours of sleep completed a five-week at-home experimental protocol: a baseline week to determine typical sleep (TYP), followed in a counterbalanced order by two-week spans in which school-night bedtimes and rise times were (a) matched to TYP or (b) modified to extend (EXT) time in bed by 1.5 h/night. Sleep was monitored by actigraphy. Self- and parent-reported SCT and inattention and self-reported driving problems were recorded at baseline and following each condition. Of the 38 eligible participants who completed the baseline session, 24 completed all five weeks of the protocol. Results After controlling for inattention, only parent-reported SCT was significantly positively associated with self-reported purposeful driving violations at baseline. Adolescents reported lesser SCT during EXT than during TYP. Further, after controlling for inattention, participants who reported improvement in SCT demonstrated fewer driving problems during EXT than during TYP. Conclusions Preliminary findings suggest that extending sleep in short-sleeping adolescents may help alleviate SCT symptoms and improve driving.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.09.003

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One potential cause of SCT may be insufficient or poor quality sleep.

    “one potential cause of SCT may be insufficient or poor quality sleep (Becker, Epstein, et al., 2018; Garner et al., 2017; Langberg et al., 2014).”

    From Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Personality: Links to BIS/BAS Sensitivity and the Five Factor Model (2018) · cites this paper as Garner et al., 2017

    The Discussion reports that extending sleep reduced adolescents’ self-reported SCT symptoms and suggests a possible cause-and-effect relationship between sleep and SCT. This supports insufficient sleep as a potential contributor, but the study did not test whether poor sleep quality causes SCT symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garner, A. A., Hansen, A., Baxley, C., Becker, S. P., Sidol, C. A., & Beebe, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Garner, Annie A.
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
30
Pages
93-96
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2535308839
Cited by
37
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • State of Ohio Emergency Medical Services (134987)
  • National Research Service Award (T32HT1002)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH108603)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep extension, sluggish cognitive tempo, adolescents, driver behavior, traffic offenses, inattention, sleep deprivation, bedtime and wake-up time, actigraphy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Automobile Driving, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review