Cited by 368Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The internal, external, and diagnostic validity of sluggish cognitive tempo: a meta-analysis and critical review

Open access
Becker, Stephen P., Leopold, Daniel R., Burns, G. Leonard, Jarrett, Matthew A., Langberg, Joshua M., Marshall, Stephen A., McBurnett, Keith, Waschbusch, Daniel A. +1 more·2016·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To conduct the first meta-analysis evaluating the internal and external validity of the sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) construct as related to or distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and as associated with functional impairment and neuropsychological functioning.Method Electronic databases were searched through September 2015 for studies examining the factor structure and/or correlates of SCT in children or adults. The search procedures identified 73 papers. The core SCT behaviors included across studies, as well as factor loadings and reliability estimates, were reviewed to evaluate internal validity. Pooled correlation effect sizes using random effects models were used to evaluate SCT in relation to external validity domains (i.e., demographics, other psychopathologies, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning).Results Strong support was found for the internal validity of the SCT construct. Specifically, across factor analytic studies including more than 19,000 individuals, 13 SCT items loaded consistently on an SCT factor as opposed to an ADHD factor. Findings also support the reliability (i.e., internal consistency, test-retest reliability, interrater reliability) of SCT. In terms of external validity, there is some indication that SCT may increase with age (r = 0.11) and be associated with lower socioeconomic status (r = 0.10). Modest (potentially negligible) support was found for SCT symptoms being higher in males than females in children (r = 0.05) but not in adults. SCT is more strongly associated with ADHD inattention (r = 0.63 in children, r = 0.72 in adults) than with ADHD hyperactivity-impulsivity (r = 0.32 in children, r = 0.46 in adults), and it likewise appears that SCT is more strongly associated with internalizing symptoms than with externalizing symptoms. SCT is associated with significant global, social, and academic impairment (r = 0.38-0.44). Effects for neuropsychological functioning are mixed, although there is initial support for SCT being associated with processing speed, sustained attention, and metacognitive deficits.Conclusion This meta-analytic review provides strong support for the internal validity of SCT and preliminary support for the external validity of SCT. In terms of diagnostic validity, there is currently not enough evidence to describe SCT in diagnostic terms. Key directions for future research are discussed, including evaluating the conceptualization of SCT as a transdiagnostic construct and the need for longitudinal research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.006

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When ADHD-IN is covaried, SCT is either unrelated or negatively related to ADHD-HI.

    “SCT is unassociated or negatively associated with ADHD-HI when covarying ADHD-IN10”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    In Results, under “SCT in Relation to Other Psychopathologies,” the review says several studies found SCT unassociated or negatively associated with hyperactivity-impulsivity after controlling for ADHD inattention. Its summary says this pattern occurs “often,” whereas the citing sentence states it without that qualifier. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SCT is strongly related to depression in dimensional analyses of children and adults, with meta-analytic correlations of .49 to .50.

    “SCT is strongly related to depression in dimensional analyses of both children and adults (meta-analytic rs=.49–.50)”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results section, “SCT in Relation to Other Psychopathologies” (page unavailable), reports meta-analytic correlations between SCT and other symptom dimensions in children and adults. The Discussion calls the SCT–depression association strong. The passages in our copy do not give the claimed depression-specific correlations of .49–.50, so those figures cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SCT has small but significant associations with a range of externalizing behaviors, with meta-analytic correlations from .21 to .36.

    “Studies show small but significant associations between SCT and a range of externalizing behaviors (meta-analytic rs = .21–.36),10”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results section on SCT in relation to other psychopathologies reports significant, small-to-medium correlations with measured psychopathology dimensions, including externalizing symptoms. It refers to weighted correlations in Table 5, but the passages available from our copy do not give the claimed .21–.36 range, so that numerical detail cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SCT is associated with informant ratings of overall academic impairment in childhood, with a medium pooled effect size of .44.

    “SCT is associated with informant ratings of overall academic impairment in childhood, with a medium pooled effect size (overall r = .44).10”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results section on functional impairment reports a moderate pooled association between SCT and academic impairment in children and adolescents, within a range of weighted correlations of 0.38–0.44 across global, social, and academic domains. The available passage does not assign 0.44 specifically to overall academic impairment or establish that this estimate is limited to informant ratings. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A meta-analysis indicates SCT is associated with significant global impairment and lower quality of life in children and adults, with pooled correlations of .40 to .50.

    “A meta-analysis indicates that SCT is associated with significant global impairment and lower quality of life in children and adults (pooled rs = .40–.50).10”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results section on functional impairment reports significant global impairment in children and adolescents (weighted rs = 0.38–0.44) and adults (r = 0.52). It also reports poorer quality of life in adults, but not children, and does not give a pooled quality-of-life correlation. Thus the claimed pooled range of .40–.50 does not accurately describe all the stated outcomes and populations. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [84]Fassbender C Krafft CE Schweitzer JB Differentiating SCT and inattentive symptoms in ADHD using fMRI measures of cognitive control NeuroImage: Clinical 2015 8 390 397 26106564 PMC4474281

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, S. P., Leopold, D. R., Burns, G. L., Jarrett, M. A., Langberg, J. M., Marshall, S. A., McBurnett, K., Waschbusch, D. A., & Willcutt, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Becker, Stephen P.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
163-178
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2211212874
Cited by
368
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH108603)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD068728)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, internal validity, generalizability, diagnostic validity, factor structure, reliability statistics, functional disability, neuropsychological performance, processing speed, sustained attention, metacognitive deficits, internalizing problems, transdiagnostic constructs, children and adults, socioeconomic status, sex differences, age differences, academic impairment, social dysfunction, hyperactivity/impulsivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Psychiatry, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review