The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of the human circadian clock
Open accessAbstract
Humans show large inter-individual differences in organising their behaviour within the 24-h day-this is most obvious in their preferred timing of sleep and wakefulness. Sleep and wake times show a near-Gaussian distribution in a given population, with extreme early types waking up when extreme late types fall asleep. This distribution is predominantly based on differences in an individuals' circadian clock. The relationship between the circadian system and different "chronotypes" is formally and genetically well established in experimental studies in organisms ranging from unicells to mammals. To investigate the epidemiology of the human circadian clock, we developed a simple questionnaire (Munich ChronoType Questionnaire, MCTQ) to assess chronotype. So far, more than 55,000 people have completed the MCTQ, which has been validated with respect to the Horne-Østberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ), objective measures of activity and rest (sleep-logs and actimetry), and physiological parameters. As a result of this large survey, we established an algorithm which optimises chronotype assessment by incorporating the information on timing of sleep and wakefulness for both work and free days. The timing and duration of sleep are generally independent. However, when the two are analysed separately for work and free days, sleep duration strongly depends on chronotype. In addition, chronotype is both age- and sex-dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These data should also be interpreted with consideration of the fact that the sleep duration variable did not distinguish between work days and free days [13] and that portion size for fruit and vegetable intake used UK (not USA) guidelines.”
From Smoking, screen-based sedentary behavior, and diet associated with habitual sleep duration and chronotype: data from the UK Biobank (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Other genes, like Bmal1 and Per1/2 and Cry1/2 were found to form an important transcriptional-translational feedback loop in the circadian system (6,52) .”
From Meal irregularity and cardiometabolic consequences: results from observational and intervention studies (2016) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“All participants were non-smokers, right-handed (as assessed by the Edinburgh Handedness Scale64), and had no diagnosed sleep- or memory-disorders.”
From Random auditory stimulation during sleep disturbs traveling slow waves and declarative memory (2026) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness- eveningness in human circadian rhythms
Home, J. K. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,783
(1976) · PubMed · Cited by 3,979
Life between Clocks: Daily Temporal Patterns of Human Chronotypes
Roenneberg, T., Wirz-Justice, A., & Merrow, M. (2003) · Journal of Biological Rhythms · doi:10.1177/0748730402239679 · Cited by 2,662
Self-citationA functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents
Pittendrigh, C. S., & Daan, S. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf01417856 · Cited by 2,129
Pittendrigh, C. S., & Daan, S. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Physiology ? A · doi:10.1007/bf01417860 · Cited by 1,636
A marker for the end of adolescence
Roenneberg, T., Kuehnle, T., Pramstaller, P. P., Ricken, J., Havel, M., Guth, A., & Merrow, M. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039 · Cited by 1,585
Self-citationExogenous and Endogenous Components in Circadian RhythmsPreprint
Aschoff, J. (1960) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1960.025.01.004 · Cited by 1,487
An h Per2 Phosphorylation Site Mutation in Familial Advanced Sleep Phase Syndrome
Toh, K. L., Jones, C. R., He, Y., Eide, E. J., Hinz, W. A., Virshup, D. M., Ptáček, L. J., & Fu, Y.-H. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057499 · Cited by 1,460
Time zones: a comparative genetics of circadian clocks
Young, M. W., & Kay, S. A. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35088576 · Cited by 1,159
Melanopsin ( Opn4 ) Requirement for Normal Light-Induced Circadian Phase Shifting
Panda, S., Sato, T. K., Castrucci, A. M., Rollag, M. D., DeGrip, W. J., Hogenesch, J. B., Provencio, I., & Kay, S. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076848 · Cited by 861
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Putilov, 2000, Association of the circadian phase with two morningness–eveningness scales of an enlarged version of the sleep–wake pattern assessment questionnaire, Arbeitswiss Betriebl Praxis, 17, 317
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Teachers’ preference for later school start times
Albrecht, J. N., Werner, H., Yaw, M. L., Jenni, O. G., & Huber, R. (2022) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13534 · Cited by 3
Random auditory stimulation during sleep disturbs traveling slow waves and declarative memory
Roüast, N. M., Kumral, D., Gais, S., & Schönauer, M. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116601
Rolling, J., Monnier, L., Zanfonato, T., Kilic-Huck, U., Ruppert, E., Comtet, H., Mengin, A., Fernandez, A., Kerbage, H., Bourgin, P., et al. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1007/s44470-026-00098-4
“Chronotype [45] was assessed with: • Horne & Ostberg questionnaire (H&O) [46, 47]; scoring: ≥ 70 = extreme morning type, ≤ 30 = extreme evening type.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Roenneberg, T., Kuehnle, T., Juda, M., Kantermann, T., Allebrandt, K., Gordijn, M., & Merrow, M.
- Affiliations
- Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (DE)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Roenneberg, Till
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 429-438
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171931117
- Cited by
- 1,545
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 101 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- circadian clock, chronotype, Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, sleep timing, sleep duration, actigraphy, questionnaire validation, age and sex differences, interindividual variability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Biological Clocks, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Population Surveillance, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Sleep, Wakefulness, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
