Cited by 96Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Effect of preoperative body mass index on weight loss after obesity surgery

Open access
Ochner, Christopher N., Jochner, Magdalena C.E., Caruso, Elizabeth A., Teixeira, Julio, Xavier Pi-Sunyer, F.·2013·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background Previous studies suggest that individuals with body mass index (BMI) above versus below 60 kg/m(2) attain lower percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) after bariatric surgery. The objectives of this study were to (1) test whether conclusions drawn about the effect of preoperative BMI on postoperative weight loss depend on the outcome measure, (2) test for evidence of a threshold effect at BMI = 60 kg/m(2), and (3) test the effect from surgery to 12-month follow-up, relative to 12- to 36-month follow-up.Methods Retrospective analyses of participants grouped according to preoperative BMI: 35-39.9 (n = 232); 40-49.9 (n = 1166); 50-59.9 (n = 429);≥60 (n = 166).Results As anticipated, individuals with higher versus lower preoperative BMI had greater total weight loss but lower %EWL at all postoperative time points (all, P<.0005). However, these individuals also had lower percentage of initial weight loss (%IWL) at all time points beyond 1 month postsurgery (all, P<.0005). From 12- to 36-months, individuals with BMI 35-39.9 had 3.2±14.3 %IWL (P<.0001); 40-49.9 had 1.0±8.9 %IWL (P<.0005); 50-59.9 had-2.4±10.0 %IWL (P<.0005); and≥60 had-3.6±11.5 %IWL (P<.0005). Overall F3,1989 = 20.2, P< .0005.Conclusions Conclusions drawn about the effect of preoperative BMI may depend on the outcome measure. A dosage effect of preoperative BMI was apparent, with heavier individuals showing lower percentages of initial and excess weight loss, regardless of BMI above or below 60 kg/m(2). Finally, this effect was particularly apparent after the initial 12-month rapid weight loss phase, when less obese (BMI<50) individuals continued losing weight, while heavier individuals (BMI≥50) regained significant weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2012.12.009

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with a pre-surgical BMI of ≥50 kg/m2 are more likely to regain weight, while a lower pre-surgical BMI is associated with more successful weight loss 12 to 36 months after surgery.

    “Patients with a pre-surgical BMI of ≥ 50 kg/m2 are more likely to regain weight, while a lower pre-surgical BMI has been associated with more successful weight loss outcomes 12 to 36 months after surgery [48].”
  • Higher preoperative BMI was associated with weight regain and a worse weight trajectory, where patients with baseline BMI ≥50 kg/m2 were more likely to have significant weight regain, while those with BMI <50 kg/m2 were more likely to continue losing weight at 12 months post-surgery.

    “higher preoperative BMI was associated with WR and a worse weight trajectory, where patients with baseline BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 were more likely to have significant WR, while those with BMI < 50 kg/m2 were more likely to continue losing weight at 12 months post-surgery [76].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ochner, C. N., Jochner, M. C. E., Caruso, E. A., Teixeira, J., & Xavier Pi-Sunyer, F.
Affiliations
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ochner, Christopher N.
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
423-427
ISSN
1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072823620
Cited by
96
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK026687)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024157)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Care, Preoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Gastric Bypass, Gastroplasty, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review