Cited by 401Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy

Gagner, Michel, Hutchinson, Colleen, Rosenthal, Raul·2016·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background For the purpose of building best practice guidelines, an international expert panel was surveyed in 2014 and compared with the 2011 Sleeve Gastrectomy Consensus and with survey data culled from a general surgeon audience.Objectives To measure advancement on aspects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and identify current best practices.Setting International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) 2014, Fifth International Summit for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Montréal, Canada.Methods In August 2014, expert surgeons (based on having performed>1000 cases) completed an online anonymous survey. Identical survey questions were then administered to general surgeon attendees.Results One hundred twenty bariatric surgeons completed the expert survey, along with 103 bariatric surgeons from IFSO 2014 general surgeon audience. The following indications were endorsed: as a stand-alone procedure (97.5%); in high-risk patients (92.4%); in kidney and liver transplant candidates (91.6%); in patients with metabolic syndrome (83.8%); body mass index 30-35 with associated co-morbidities (79.8%); in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (87.4%); and in the elderly (89.1%). Significant differences existed between the expert and general surgeons groups in endorsing several contraindications: Barrett's esophagus (80.0% versus 31.3% [P<.001]), gastroesophageal reflux disease (23.3% versus 52.5% [P<.001]), hiatal hernias (11.7% versus 54.0% [P<.001]), and body mass index>60 kg/m(2) (5.0% versus 28.0% [P<.001]). Average reported weight loss outcomes 5 years postoperative were significantly higher for the expert surgeons group (P = .005), as were reported stricture (P = .001) and leakage (P = .005) rates. The following significant differences exist between 2014 and 2011 expert surgeons: Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease should have pH and manometry study pre-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (32.8% versus 50.0%; P = .033); it is important to take down the vessels before resection (88.1% versus 81.8%; P = .025); it is acceptable to buttress (81.4% versus 77.3%; P<.001); the smaller the bougie size and tighter the sleeve, the higher the incidence of leaks (78.8% versus 65.2%; P = .006).Conclusion This study highlights areas of new and improved best practices on various aspects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performance among experts from 2011 and 2014 and among the current general surgeon population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.022

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the Fifth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy, 43% of surgeons preferred buttressing material for suture line reinforcement, 29% preferred oversewing, and 28% did not use suture line reinforcement.

    “According to the Fifth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy, 43% of surgeons preferred buttressing material for suture line reinforcement, 29% preferred oversewing and the remaining 28% did not use suture line reinforcement [96].”
  • The Fifth International Consensus Summit survey found that bariatric surgeons tend to use a larger bougie than previously recorded, with a median size of 36F, and that more experts believe smaller bougies are associated with stricture and leaks (from 65% in 2011 to 79% in 2014, P = 0.006).

    “The Fifth International Consensus Summit survey found that bariatric surgeons tend to use a larger bougie than previously recorded, the median size being 36F, most probably to avoid strictures and leak associated with stricture [96]. One of the widest differences between the consensus summit report of 2011 and 2014 is that more experts believe that smaller bougies are associated with stricture and”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagner, M., Hutchinson, C., & Rosenthal, R.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenthal, Raul
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
750-756
ISSN
1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2250960278
Cited by
401
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
41.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medtronic
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Gastrectomy, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Gastroplasty, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review