Cited by 673Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

First Report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy has Morbidity and Effectiveness Positioned Between the Band and the Bypass

Open access
Hutter, Matthew M., Schirmer, Bruce D., Jones, Daniel B., Ko, Clifford Y., Cohen, Mark E., Merkow, Ryan P., Nguyen, Ninh T.·2011·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as compared to the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and the open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ORYGB) for the treatment of obesity and obesity-related diseases. BACKGROUND: LSG is a newer procedure being done with increasing frequency. However, limited data are currently available comparing LSG to the other established procedures. We present the first prospective, multiinstitutional, nationwide, clinically rich, bariatric-specific data comparing sleeve gastrectomy to the adjustable gastric band, and the gastric bypass. METHODS: This is the initial report analyzing data from the American College of Surgeons-Bariatric Surgery Center Network accreditation program, and its prospective, longitudinal, data collection system based on standardized definitions and collected by trained data reviewers. Univariate and multivariate analyses compare 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year outcomes including morbidity and mortality, readmissions, and reoperations as well as reduction in body mass index (BMI) and weight-related comorbidities. RESULTS: One hundred nine hospitals submitted data for 28,616 patients, from July, 2007 to September, 2010. The LSG has higher risk-adjusted morbidity, readmission and reoperation/intervention rates compared to the LAGB, but lower reoperation/intervention rates compared to the LRYGB and ORYGB. There were no differences in mortality. Reduction in BMI and most of the weight-related comorbidities after the LSG also lies between those of the LAGB and the LRYGB/ORYGB. CONCLUSION: LSG has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the LAGB and the LRYGB/ORYGB for data up to 1 year. As obesity is a lifelong disease, longer term comparative effectiveness data are most critical, and are yet to be determined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e31822c9dac

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calcium malabsorption has been documented as early as 3 months after RYGB, with reduced true fractional calcium absorption and secondary hyperparathyroidism.

    “Calcium malabsorption has been documented as early as 3 months after RYGB53, 54 with reduced true fractional absorption of calcium57, and secondary hyperparathyroidism52, 53, 58, 59.”
  • After RYGB, patients typically lose 35% of initial weight or 62-75% of excess body weight, significantly more than with gastric banding.

    “After RYGB, patients typically lose 35% of initial weight, or 62-75% of excess body weight47, 52-54, significantly greater than with GB.55, 56.”
  • Resorption markers increase steadily by up to 200% over the first 12-18 months after RYGB.

    “Resorption markers increase steadily by up to 200% over the first 12-18 months 52, 63, 64.”
  • A strong association between extent of weight loss after bariatric surgery and amount of bone loss has been documented by most but not all studies.

    “A strong association between extent of weight loss after bariatric surgery and amount of bone loss has been documented bymost40, 45, 51-53, 62, 67 but not all studies.63”
  • Spine BMD changes after RYGB are variable, with some studies reporting small decreases and others not.

    “Changes at the spine are more variable, some studies report small decreases 24, 54, 63, 67-69, while others have not 52, 53, 65, 66.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutter, M. M., Schirmer, B. D., Jones, D. B., Ko, C. Y., Cohen, M. E., Merkow, R. P., & Nguyen, N. T.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • American College of Surgeons (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hutter, Matthew M.
  • Merkow, Ryan P.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2011-09
Volume
254
Issue
3
Pages
410-422
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072882958
Cited by
673
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 27
FWCI
56.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB009362, R01EB005807)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, obesity, obesity-related comorbidities, postoperative morbidity, hospital readmission, reoperation, mortality, body mass index reduction, comparative effectiveness
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Analysis of Variance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrectomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Societies, Medical, United States, Gastric Bypass, Gastroplasty, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review