Cited by 180Income, Poverty, and InequalityQuality of Life MeasurementPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study

Anand, Paul, van Hees, Martin·2006·The Journal of Socio-Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.003

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anand, P., & van Hees, M.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Anand, Paul
Venue
The Journal of Socio-Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
268-284
ISSN
1053-5357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017172647
Cited by
180
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
27.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Socio-Economics (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
capability approach, Amartya Sen, achievement, welfare economics, life satisfaction, happiness, experienced utility, perceived capability, opportunity, voter attitudes, ordinal logistic regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review