Cited by 302Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEconomic and Environmental ValuationAdventure Sports and Sensation Seeking

Because It Is There: The Challenge of Mountaineering… for Utility Theory

Loewenstein, George·1999·Kyklos

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb00221.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loewenstein, G.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Loewenstein, George
Venue
Kyklos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-08
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
315-343
ISSN
  • 0023-5962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6435
OpenAlex
W2059890418
Cited by
302
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Kyklos (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
Keywords
utility theory, risk aversion, risk preferences, decision making under risk, expected utility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review