The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological predispositions and network structure: The relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“but women experience many barriers to accessing these services, such as feelings of shame or denial, lack of trust in others or fear of repercussions such as the perpetrator finding out or family members seeking revenge.11,12”
From Help‐seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support (2016) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 18,005
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,626
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self‐Categorization Theory
REID, F. J. M. (1987) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00799.x · Cited by 8,145
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition
Lazega, E., & Burt, R. S. (1995) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3322456 · Cited by 7,983
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Borgatti, 1997, Structural holes: unpacking Burt's redundancy measures, Connections, 20, 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–412 of 412
Interorganizational Learning in Alliances and Networks
Oliver, A. L., & Kalish, Y. (2011) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-694-020251006
Self-citationThe affective and relational bases of adolescent mathematics anxiety
Buckley, S. (2009)
Teachers' Social Network Tendency and Workplace Friendship: A Mixed-Method Study
Özenç, Y. Y., & Akyol, B. (2026) · Kuramsal Eğitimbilim · doi:10.30831/akukeg.1739616
Relational Compartmentalization: How Culture Keeps Our Social Worlds Apart
Wu, J., English, A. S., Zhou, X., Xu, Y., Brooks, C., Moon, K., & Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E. (2026) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251404548
“…been treated as a personality-like construct (Lecky, 1945), the current study contributes to the body of literature that suggests personality and psychological predispositions are associated with social network behaviors and structures (Rapp et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2015; Kalish & Robins, 2006).”
The influence of networks on perceived career outcomes
Bertola, L. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/90bb7414z5ccaz4c33z8784zbaf8afdd13a9
Attachment Styles Predict Personal Network Structure Better Than Big Five Traits
Tinoco, E. G., Letina, S., & Maya‐Jariego, I. (2026) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2026.10048
“…or clustering), with traits such as extraversion and agreeableness more consistently linked to larger and more socially active networks, and conscientiousness or neuroticism showing more nuanced associations with network structure (Kalish & Robins, 2006; Pollet et al., 2011; Wrzus et al., 2017).”
Connecting the dots: exploring antecedents and consequences of cognitive accuracy in the workplace
Han, J., & Krikhaar, J. (2026) · Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship · doi:10.1108/ebhrm-03-2026-0126
Campus Embeddedness: A Relational Approach to Shaping Structures for College Student Success
Smith, R. A. (2026) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-026-09946-w
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalish, Y., & Robins, G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Robins, Garry
- Venue
- Social Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-84
- ISSN
- 0378-8733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161734804
- Semantic Scholar
- ba6dda25d976e4ec3e4e23aeb5bd37d58e12f7e9
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Networks (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- structural holes, network closure, strength of weak ties, personal networks, social network structure, individualism, neuroticism, extraversion, perceived susceptibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
