Cited by 91Social Capital and NetworksJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations

Saint-Charles, Johanne, Mongeau, Pierre·2009·Social Networks

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.09.001

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the program design stage researchers usually measure networks of expertise and trust operationalized as advice and discussion questions.

    “In the program design stage researchers usually measure networks of expertise and trust operationalized as “who do you go to for advice” and “who do you discuss problems with”[66, 67].”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Burkhardt,M.E.,Brass,D.J., 1990. Changingpatternsofchangeintechnologyonsocial network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 104-127.
  2. Saint-Charles, J., 2001. Pouvoir informationnel, structure formelle et réseau émer- gentdansuneorganisation(Thesis).Montréal:UniversitéduQuébecàMontréal.
  3. Vodosek, M., 1999. Pulled apart: role stress in informal intraorganization network. In: Organizational Behavior Division for the Academy of Management Conference, Chicago.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saint-Charles, J., & Mongeau, P.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Venue
Social Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
33-39
ISSN
0378-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985104278
Cited by
91
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Networks (publishedVersion)
  • Archipel (Université du Québec à Montréal) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Université du Québec à Montréal
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
ambiguity, uncertainty, coping, cognitive trust, affective trust, expertise, friendship, information uncertainty, organizational relationships, colleague relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review