CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 428Social Capital and NetworksAttachment and Relationship DynamicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics

Open access
Roberts, Sam G.B., Dunbar, Robin I.M., Pollet, Thomas V., Kuppens, Toon·2009·Social Networks
DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.002

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Roberts, S.G.B., 2009. Constraints on network size. Proceedings of the British Academy, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 428

Related

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, S. G. B., Dunbar, R. I. M., Pollet, T. V., & Kuppens, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Sam G.B.
ORCID
Venue
Social Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
138-146
ISSN
0378-8733 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.socnet.2008.12.002
OpenAlex
W2100637281
Cited by
428
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
63.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Social Networks (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
network size, emotional closeness, network composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review