Cited by 233Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and Politics

Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate

Open access
Del Vicario, Michela, Zollo, Fabiana, Caldarelli, Guido, Scala, Antonio, Quattrociocchi, Walter·2017·Social Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.02.002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W.
Affiliations
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
Venue
Social Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
50
Pages
6-16
ISSN
0378-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593259672
Cited by
233
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
60.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Networks (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
Brexit, Facebook, echo chambers, polarization, news consumption, selective exposure, confirmation bias, topic extraction, sentiment analysis, online debate, social dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review