Cited by 77Workplace Health and Well-beingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Sickness absence and sickness attendance—What people with neck or back pain think

Hansson, Margareta, Boström, Carina, Harms-Ringdahl, Karin·2006·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This study explores the decision of 33 men and women to be sick-listed from work for neck pain or low-back pain. Qualitative interviews with the subjects, who lived in a city or a sparsely populated area of Sweden, were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed in the interpretive tradition by the three authors. New, intense and threatening pain quickly made persons report sick. For other pain, sickness absence, its timing and duration, were negotiated on the basis of the subjects' self-image, work-duty norms, organisational and extra-organisational work factors. Thirty-one people aimed to return to work, but spine-related pain was a hindrance. Five strategies to avoid, delay or shorten sickness absence were identified. Concepts of the illness flexibility model well described how the workers balanced the factors driving them from work and those forcing them or attracting them to remain. The conclusion is that reporting sick is neither undertaken lightly nor for short-term reasons only. Instead, personal history and anticipated future, spine-related pain, workplace and labour market factors are also important considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.002

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansson, M., Boström, C., & Harms-Ringdahl, K.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Hansson, Margareta
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
2183-2195
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050282647
Cited by
77
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sick leave, neck pain, low back pain, return to work, self-image, workplace factors, labor market factors, pain intensity and duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Back Pain, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Sweden, Sick Leave, Neck Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review