Cited by 70HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Applying an intersectional framework to understand syndemic conditions among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men

Open access
Quinn, Katherine G.·2022·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Syndemic theory has been useful in illuminating the co-existence and reinforcing nature of multiple health and social conditions that contribute to HIV risk. However, little research has examined syndemics among young Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) or situated syndemics within the context of racism, homonegativity, and other intersecting social inequities. Applying an intersectional framework to syndemics can help demonstrate how social and structural inequities and oppression facing young Black GBM contribute to and reinforce syndemic health conditions. In 2018, we conducted 45 in-depth qualitative interviews with young Black GBM in Milwaukee and Cleveland. Our analyses examined how intersectional stigma contributes to syndemics and HIV disparities facing young Black GBM. Our findings demonstrate that broader systems of oppression and disadvantage facing young Black GBM contribute to syndemic conditions. Future conceptualizations and measurements of syndemics must capture these experiences to strengthen our understanding of syndemics among young Black GBM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112779

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, K. G.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Quinn, Katherine G.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
295
Pages
112779
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998572246
Cited by
70
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
syndemic, intersectionality, young Black men who have sex with men, HIV disparities, HIV risk, racism, homonegativity, intersectional stigma, social inequities, systemic oppression, sexual minority health
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Syndemic, Intersectional Framework, Humans, Male, HIV Infections, Homosexuality, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review