Cited by 137Gender, Health, and Social InequalityFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesCultural Competency in Health Care

Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research

Kelly, Ursula A.·2009·Advances in Nursing Science

Abstract

Persisting health disparities have lead to calls for an increase in health research to address them. Biomedical scientists call for research that stratifies individual indicators associated with health disparities, for example, ethnicity. Feminist social scientists recommend feminist intersectionality research. Intersectionality is the multiplicative effect of inequalities experienced by nondominant marginalized groups, for example, ethnic minorities, women, and the poor. The elimination of health disparities necessitates integration of both paradigms in health research. This study provides a practical application of the integration of biomedical and feminist intersectionality paradigms in nursing research, using a psychiatric intervention study with battered Latino women as an example.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ans.0b013e3181a3b3fc

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating intersectionality with PAR in a disadvantaged community would have enabled a fuller understanding of health disparities.

    “Integrating intersectionality with PAR in a disadvantaged community would have enabled a fuller understanding of health disparities (Kelly, 2009).”

    From Guyanese Women's Experiences of Invisibility in Health Care in England (2020) · cites this paper as Kelly, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, U. A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Ursula A.
Venue
Advances in Nursing Science
Published
2009-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
E42-E56
ISSN
0161-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087477129
Cited by
137
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
19.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR007091)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
intersectionality, health disparities, intersectional feminism, biomedicine, paradigm integration, nursing research, psychiatric intervention, ethnic minorities, marginalized communities
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Philosophy, Nursing, Psychiatric Nursing, Psychotherapy, Group, Research Design, Social Justice, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Nursing Research, Battered Women, Feminism, Biomedical Research, Qualitative Research, Emigrants and Immigrants, Health Status Disparities, Evidence-Based Practice, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review