Cited by 460Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from Chinese paddy soils

Feng, Youzhi, Xu, Yanping, Yu, Yongchang, Xie, Zubin, Lin, Xiangui·2012·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Paddy fields are one of the largest anthropogenic sources of global CH₄ emission. A decrease in paddy CH₄ emission can contribute significantly towards the control of global warming. Recent studies have demonstrated that the application of biochar in paddy soils has such a capability, but its underlying mechanism has yet to be elucidated. In this investigation, we studied CH₄ emission, methanogenic archaeal, as well as methanotrophic proteobacterial communities, from microcosms derived from two paddy soils, Inceptisol and Ultisol. Both soils were amended with biochar at different pyrolysis temperatures (300 °C, 400 °C and 500 °C) at field condition. The soil CH₄ flux was monitored across whole rice season in 2010; the functional guilds communities were analyzed by PCR–DGGE and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). It is found that paddy CH₄ emissions significantly decreased under biochar amendments, which, interestingly, didn't result from the inhibition of methanogenic archaeal growth. qPCR further revealed that biochar amendments (1) increased methanotrophic proteobacterial abundances significantly, and (2) decreased the ratios of methanogenic to methanotrophic abundances greatly. These results shed insight on the underlying mechanism of how biochar decreases paddy CH₄ emission. This knowledge can be applied to develop a more effective greenhouse gas mitigation process for paddy fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rice paddies release CH4 at a higher rate as compared with upland soils.

    “This is the reason why rice paddies release ­ CH 4 at a higher rate as compared with upland soils (Feng et  al. 2012).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Feng et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, Y., Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Xie, Z., & Lin, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xie, Zubin
  • Lin, Xiangui
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
46
Pages
80-88
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063384379
Cited by
460
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, methane emissions, paddy soil, methanogenic archaea, methanotrophic bacteria, Proteobacteria, pyrolysis temperature, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, rice cultivation, Inceptisol, Ultisol, microbial community composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review