The stability of low- and high-ash biochars in acidic soils of contrasting mineralogy
Abstract
The potential of biochar as a tool for long-term soil carbon (C) storage has led to an increasing interest in its use as a soil amendment. While much research has been conducted on the stability of high C and low ash biochars, the stability of low C (with relatively high inorganic C) and high ash biochars has been largely neglected. In light of this, an incubation experiment was conducted to compare and assess the stability of a high ash and low C biochar produced from tomato green waste and low ash and high C biochar produced from blue mallee biomass. The two biochars were applied at 2% and 4% (w/w) to two acidic soils of contrasting mineralogy, a Ferralsol and a Solonetz. The soil–biochar mixtures were incubated at 20 °C for 120 days. The CO2–C mineralised was captured in NaOH traps and the source of C mineralisation determined by isotope analysis. The tomato biochar was mineralised (1.4–3.7%) to a greater extent than the blue mallee biochar (0.28–0.77%), possibly due to dissolution of the large quantity of inorganic C. In biochar amended soils, with the exception of the Solonetz applied with 2% blue mallee biochar, greater cumulative mineralisation (positive priming) of native SOC occurred as compared to their respective controls. Mean residence time for the two biochars suggests much greater potential of the blue mallee biochar for long-term soil C storage than the tomato biochar. However, the tomato biochar may have greater agronomic value, in particular a high liming potential, although field studies are required to confirm these results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A low ash content is favorable for negative priming because of the limited introduction of inorganic nutrients for microbial growth.
“A low ash content is also favorable for negative priming, because of the limited introduction of inorganic nutrients for microbial growth (Murray et al. 2015).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Murray et al. 2015
Cites
A review of biochar and its use and function in soil
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)05002-9 · Cited by 2,240 · see citing works
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5 · Cited by 2,154 · see citing works
Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms
Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W., & Rillig, M. C. (2007) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5 · Cited by 1,269 · see citing works
Cheng, C.-H., Lehmann, J., & Engelhard, M. H. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.010 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Biochar Carbon Stability in a Clayey Soil As a Function of Feedstock and Pyrolysis Temperature
Singh, B. P., Cowie, A. L., & Smernik, R. J. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302545b · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Self-citationDecomposition and carbonisation of wood biopolymers—a microstructural study of softwood pyrolysis
Paris, O., Zollfrank, C., & Zickler, G. A. (2005) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2004.08.034 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
A method for screening the relative long‐term stability of biochar
Cross, A., & Sohi, S. P. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12035 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhu, X., Chen, B., Zhu, L., & Xing, B. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032 · Cited by 1,021 · see citing works
Biochemical cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in biochar-amended soils
Gul, S., & Whalen, J. K. (2016) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.001 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Ding, F., Van Zwieten, L., Zhang, W., Weng, Z., Shi, S., Wang, J., & Meng, J. (2018) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1899-6 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murray, J., Keith, A., & Singh, B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Balwant
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 217-225
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W998815251
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James Cook University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Keywords
- biochar stability, soil carbon storage, acid soils, soil mineralogy, CO2 mineralization, carbon isotope analysis, Ferralsols, solonetz, biochar amendment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review