The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial stoichiometric flexibility regulates rice straw mineralization and its priming effect in paddy soil
Abstract
Abstract Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability plays a crucial role in carbon (C) cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the C:N:P stoichiometric regulation of microbial mineralization of plant residues and its impact on the soil priming effect (PE), measured as CO2 and CH4 emission, in paddy soils remain unclear. In this study, the effect of soil C:N:P stoichiometry (regulated by the application of N and P fertilizers) on the mineralization of 13C-labelled rice straw and the subsequent PE was investigated in a 100-day incubation experiment in flooded paddy soil. N and P additions increased straw mineralization by approximately 25% and 10%, respectively. Additions of both N and P led to higher CO2 efflux, but lower CH4 emission. With an increase in the ratios of DOC:NH4+-N, DOC:Olsen P, and microbial biomass C:N, 13CO2 efflux increased exponentially to a maximum. Compared with sole straw addition, exclusive N addition led to a weaker PE for CO2 emission, whereas exclusive P addition induced a stronger PE for CO2 emission. In contrast, CH4 emitted from native soil organic matter (SOM) was reduced by 7.4% and 46.1% following P and NP application, respectively. Structural equation models suggest that available N had dominant and direct positive effects, whereas microbial biomass stoichiometry mainly exerted negative indirect effects on PE. The stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity directly down-regulated CH4 emission from SOM. Microbes obviously regulate soil C turnover via stoichiometric flexibility to maintain an elemental stoichiometric balance between resources and microbial requirements. The addition of straw in combination with N and P fertilization in paddy soils could therefore meet microbial stoichiometric requirements and regulate microbial activity and extracellular enzyme production, resulting in co-metabolism of fresh C and native SOM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: A Bacterium That Can Grow by Using Arsenic Instead of Phosphorus
Wolfe-Simon, F., Blum, J. S., Kulp, T. R., Gordon, G. W., Hoeft, S. E., Pett-Ridge, J., Stolz, J. F., Webb, S. M., Weber, P. K., Davies, P. C. W., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197258 · Cited by 503
RetractedSoil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security
Lal, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097396 · Cited by 8,376
Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects
Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J. K., & Stahr, K. (2000) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00084-5 · Cited by 3,040
Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction—an automated procedure
Wu, J., Joergensen, R. G., Pommerening, B., Chaussod, R., & Brookes, P. C. (1990) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3 · Cited by 2,499
Self-citationC:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
Chen, R., Senbayram, M., Blagodatsky, S., Myachina, O., Dittert, K., Lin, X., Blagodatskaya, E., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12475 · Cited by 1,222
MICROBIAL NITROGEN LIMITATION INCREASES DECOMPOSITION
Craine, J. M., Morrow, C., & Fierer, N. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-1847.1 · Cited by 1,078
Banerjee, S., Kirkby, C. A., Schmutter, D., Bissett, A., Kirkegaard, J. A., & Richardson, A. E. (2016) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.017 · Cited by 1,050
A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils
Marx, M.-C., Wood, M., & Jarvis, S. C. (2001) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(01)00079-7 · Cited by 1,046
Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry and Ecological Theory
Sinsabaugh, R. L., & Follstad Shah, J. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-071112-124414 · Cited by 1,040
Cited by
Cui, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, X., Liu, S., Jones, D. L., Kuzyakov, Y., Shibistova, O., Wu, J., & Ge, T. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107720 · Cited by 473
Self-citationWei, X., Hu, Y., Razavi, B. S., Zhou, J., Shen, J., Nannipieri, P., Wu, J., & Ge, T. (2019) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.025 · Cited by 336
Self-citationLu, X., Li, Y., Wang, H., Singh, B. P., Hu, S., Luo, Y., Li, J., Xiao, Y., Cai, X., & Li, Y. (2019) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.001 · Cited by 111
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, Z., Ge, T., Luo, Y., Liu, S., Xu, X., Tong, C., Shibistova, O., Guggenberger, G., & Wu, J.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 67-76
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794336212
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 20.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial stoichiometric flexibility regulates rice straw mineralization and its priming effect in paddy soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.003
- The paper
- Zhu, Z., Ge, T., Luo, Y., Liu, S., Xu, X., Tong, C., Shibistova, O., Guggenberger, G., & Wu, J. (2018). Microbial stoichiometric flexibility regulates rice straw mineralization and its priming effect in paddy soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.