The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: Links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry
Abstract
Abstract Microbial decomposers are responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM) and thus regulate soil carbon (C) stocks. During the decomposition of OM, microorganisms can use the assimilated C for biomass production or respire it as CO2, and the fraction of growth to total assimilation defines the microbial carbon-use efficiency (CUE). As such, CUE has direct consequences for how microbial decomposers affect the balance of C between atmosphere and soil. We estimated fungal and bacterial growth in C units in microcosm systems with submerged plant litter. We established conversion factors between bacterial and fungal growth to biomass and applied this to a dataset representing 9 different sites in temperate forest soils, temperate agricultural soils, and subarctic forest soils, to estimate growth rates of fungi and bacteria in units of C, to estimate the dominance of the two decomposer groups, and to compare these values to respiration to estimate the microbial CUE. We observed that fungal-to-bacterial growth ratios (F:B) ranged from 0.02 to 0.44, and that the fungal dominance was higher in soils with lower C:N ratio and higher C-quality. We found a negative exponential relationship between the dominance of fungi and the microbial CUE. CUE ranged from 0.03 to 0.30, and values clustered most strongly according to site rather than level of soil N. CUE was higher in soil with high C:N ratio and high C-quality. However, within each land-use type, a high mineral N-content did result in lower F:B and higher resulting CUE. In conclusion, a higher soil C-quality coincided with lower F:B and higher CUE across the surveyed sites, while a higher N availability did not. A higher N availability resulted in higher CUE and lower F:B within each site suggesting that site-specific differences such as the effect of plant community via e.g. plant litter and rhizosphere input, overrode the influence of N-availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota
Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Klironomos, J. N., Setälä, H., van der Putten, W. H., & Wall, D. H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094875 · Cited by 4,617
Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
Bardgett, R. D., & van der Putten, W. H. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13855 · Cited by 3,990
Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12113 · Cited by 3,552
The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage
Liang, C., Schimel, J. P., & Jastrow, J. D. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105 · Cited by 3,320
Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities
Allison, S. D., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801925105 · Cited by 3,151
Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems
Six, J., Frey, S. D., Thiet, R. K., & Batten, K. M. (2006) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0347 · Cited by 2,176
Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems
Torsvik, V., & Øvreås, L. (2002) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00324-7 · Cited by 1,922
Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development
Boer, W. D., Folman, L. B., Summerbell, R. C., & Boddy, L. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.005 · Cited by 1,867
Lauber, C. L., Strickland, M. S., Bradford, M. A., & Fierer, N. (2008) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.021 · Cited by 1,834
Kallenbach, C. M., Frey, S. D., & Grandy, A. S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13630 · Cited by 1,806
Cited by
Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter
Angst, G., Mueller, K. E., Nierop, K. G. J., & Simpson, M. J. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108189 · Cited by 1,196
Soil organic matter priming: The pH effects
Wang, C., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17349 · Cited by 382
The biogeography of relative abundance of soil fungi versus bacteria in surface topsoil
Yu, K., van den Hoogen, J., Wang, Z., Averill, C., Routh, D., Smith, G. R., Drenovsky, R. E., Scow, K. M., Mo, F., Waldrop, M. P., et al. (2022) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-14-4339-2022 · Cited by 86
A soil food web approach to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry
Lejoly, J. D. M., Mason-Jones, K., & Veen, G. F. C. (2026) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Soares, M., & Rousk, J.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 195-205
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2910689128
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 28.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: Links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.010
- The paper
- Soares, M., & Rousk, J. (2019). Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: Links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.