CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A soil food web approach to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry

Open access
Lejoly, Justine D. M., Mason-Jones, Kyle, Veen, G. F. Ciska·2026·Communications Earth & Environment
DOI 10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4PMC PMC13065481
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Soil fauna is essential in mediating the formation and turnover of soil organic matter, the largest terrestrial pool of organic carbon, yet remains absent from nearly all existing biogeochemical conceptual frameworks. Soil fauna impacts element cycling via trophic (microbivory, herbivory, detritivory, predation) and non-trophic (bioturbation, dispersal, waste products) pathways. These effects should be integrated into multitrophic biogeochemistry by considering the environmental context (abiotic constraints, quality and quantity of carbon inputs), by including soil food web structure, and by accounting for the role of soil fauna as agents of connectivity. We highlight the need for better quantification of soil fauna and consideration of carcasses and feces as substantial carbon flows. Based on a soil food web approach, these concepts will improve the quantification of the impact of soil fauna on carbon cycling and help to predict how soil fauna will affect carbon cycling under future global change scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Five key concepts to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry. This figure illustrates pathways by which soil fauna can influence soil carbon (C) cycling and contribute to particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) pools: (1) The abiotic constraints for soil fauna and SOM formation pathways are represented in the ‘Climate’ and ‘Soil type’ panes; (2) the importance to consider quality and quantity of C inputs is showed in the ‘Litter quality’ and ‘Ecosystem size hypothesis’ panes, as well as in the different soil compartments associated with contrasting plant inputs (the rhizosphere primarily associated with root exudates, the detritusphere with litter fragments, and the bulk soil with sporadic inputs from litter leachates (orange drops) and bioturbation; (3) the role of soil fauna feeding preferences and how C flows through the soil food web and into SOM pools is illustrated in different soil compartments, of which (4) soil fauna increases the connectivity; and (5) soil fauna pools beyond living biomass are presented in the ‘Carcasses’ and ‘Consumption and excretion’ panes. The latter also links to important feeding traits: a detritivore such as an isopod ingests a great amount of litter, most of which is excreted as feces, because of lower food quality and assimilation rates, while a predator such as a centipede comparatively ingests much smaller amounts of prey, as a result of higher food quality and assimilation rates. Purple arrows indicate C flows through living organisms and black arrows after-life transfers of C and nutrients into SOM pools. The figure was entirely designed by CPiG (Carolina Levicek), including all individual elements.
Fig. 1 Five key concepts to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry. This figure illustrates pathways by which soil fauna can influence soil carbon (C) cycling and contribute to particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) pools: (1) The abiotic constraints for soil fauna and SOM formation pathways are represented in the ‘Climate’ and ‘Soil type’ panes; (2) the importance to consider quality and quantity of C inputs is showed in the ‘Litter quality’ and ‘Ecosystem size hypothesis’ panes, as well as in the different soil compartments associated with contrasting plant inputs (the rhizosphere primarily associated with root exudates, the detritusphere with litter fragments, and the bulk soil with sporadic inputs from litter leachates (orange drops) and bioturbation; (3) the role of soil fauna feeding preferences and how C flows through the soil food web and into SOM pools is illustrated in different soil compartments, of which (4) soil fauna increases the connectivity; and (5) soil fauna pools beyond living biomass are presented in the ‘Carcasses’ and ‘Consumption and excretion’ panes. The latter also links to important feeding traits: a detritivore such as an isopod ingests a great amount of litter, most of which is excreted as feces, because of lower food quality and assimilation rates, while a predator such as a centipede comparatively ingests much smaller amounts of prey, as a result of higher food quality and assimilation rates. Purple arrows indicate C flows through living organisms and black arrows after-life transfers of C and nutrients into SOM pools. The figure was entirely designed by CPiG (Carolina Levicek), including all individual elements.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Conceptualization of the role of different soil fauna trophic groups under contrasting plant inputs. The quality and availability of plant inputs can be seen as a continuum from the rhizosphere to the detritusphere associated with contrasting soil faunal and microbial communities. The three-way interaction between plant carbon inputs, soil microbes, and soil fauna determine the dominant mechanisms for soil organic matter (SOM) formation and the dominant SOM pools (particulate organic matter, POM, and mineral-associated organic matter, MAOM), given that abiotic conditions are kept constant.
Fig. 2 Conceptualization of the role of different soil fauna trophic groups under contrasting plant inputs. The quality and availability of plant inputs can be seen as a continuum from the rhizosphere to the detritusphere associated with contrasting soil faunal and microbial communities. The three-way interaction between plant carbon inputs, soil microbes, and soil fauna determine the dominant mechanisms for soil organic matter (SOM) formation and the dominant SOM pools (particulate organic matter, POM, and mineral-associated organic matter, MAOM), given that abiotic conditions are kept constant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Box Fig 1. Impacts of earthworm invasion on soils. The figure was created using soil organism sketches designed by CPiG (Carolina Levicek).
Box Fig 1. Impacts of earthworm invasion on soils. The figure was created using soil organism sketches designed by CPiG (Carolina Levicek).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 190

  1. Jobbágy, E. G., Jackson, R. B., Jobbagy, E. G. & Jackson, R. B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 10, 423–436 (2000). · DOI
  2. Bossio, D. A. et al. The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nat. Sustain. 3, 391–398 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K. & Paul, E. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 988–995 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kallenbach, C. M., Frey, S. D. & Grandy, A. S. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–10 (2016). · DOI
  5. de Vries, F. T. et al. Soil food web properties explain ecosystem services across European land use systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14296–14301 (2013). · DOI
  6. Zhang, C. et al. An integrated fast–slow plant and nematode economics spectrum predicts soil organic carbon dynamics during natural restoration. N. Phytol. 245, 2467–2479 (2024). · DOI
  7. Wiesmeier, M. et al. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils - a review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma 333, 149–162 (2019). · DOI
  8. Bonkowski, M. Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. N. Phytol. 162, 617–631 (2004). · DOI
  9. Fierer, N., Strickland, M. S., Liptzin, D., Bradford, M. A. & Cleveland, C. C. Global patterns in belowground communities. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1238–1249 (2009). · DOI
  10. Trap, J., Bonkowski, M., Plassard, C., Villenave, C. & Blanchart, E. Ecological importance of soil bacterivores for ecosystem functions. Plant Soil 398, 1–24 (2016). · DOI
  11. Bardgett, R. D., Cook, R., Yeates, G. W. & Denton, C. S. The influence of nematodes on below-ground processes in grassland ecosystems. Plant Soil 212, 23–33 (1999). · DOI
  12. Haase, S., Ruess, L., Neumann, G., Marhan, S. & Kandeler, E. Low-level herbivory by root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) modifies root hair morphology and rhizodeposition in host plants (Hordeum vulgare). Plant Soil 301, 151–164 (2007). · DOI
  13. Angst, G. et al. Conceptualizing soil fauna effects on labile and stabilized soil organic matter. Nat. Commun. 15, 1–16 (2024). · DOI
  14. Filser, J. et al. Soil fauna: key to new carbon models. Soil 2, 565–582 (2016). · DOI
  15. Grandy, A. S., Wieder, W. R., Wickings, K. & Kyker-Snowman, E. Beyond microbes: are fauna the next frontier in soil biogeochemical models? Soil Biol. Biochem. 102, 40–44 (2016). · DOI
  16. Bonfanti, J. et al. Linking effect traits of soil fauna to processes of organic matter transformation. Funct. Ecol. 39, 446–461 (2025). · DOI
  17. Bradford, M. A. Re-visioning soil food webs. Soil Biol. Biochem. 102, 1–3 (2016). · DOI
  18. Wieder, W. R., Grandy, A. S., Kallenbach, C. M. & Bonan, G. B. Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model. Biogeosciences 11, 3899–3917 (2014). · DOI
  19. Wu, D., Du, E., Eisenhauer, N., Mathieu, J. & Chu, C. Global engineering effects of soil invertebrates on ecosystem functions. Nature 640, 120–129 (2025). · DOI
  20. Zhang, Y. et al. Simulating measurable ecosystem carbon and nitrogen dynamics with the mechanistically defined MEMS 2.0 model. Biogeosciences 18, 3147–3171 (2021). · DOI
  21. Barrett, J. E., Virginia, R. A., Wall, D. H. & Adams, B. J. Decline in a dominant invertebrate species contributes to altered carbon cycling in a low-diversity soil ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1–11 (2008). · DOI
  22. Postma-Blaauw, M. B., De Goede, R. G. M., Bloem, J., Faber, J. H. & Brussaard, L. Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification. Ecology 91, 460–473 (2010). · DOI
  23. Tsiafouli, M. A. et al. Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 973–985 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Koltz, A. M., Asmus, A., Gough, L., Pressler, Y. & Moore, J. C. The detritus-based microbial-invertebrate food web contributes disproportionately to carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Arctic. Polar Biol. 41, 1531–1545 (2018). · DOI
  25. Potapov, A. M., Klarner, B., Sandmann, D., Widyastuti, R. & Scheu, S. Linking size spectrum, energy flux and trophic multifunctionality in soil food webs of tropical land-use systems. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 1845–1859 (2019). · DOI
  26. Whalen, E. D. et al. Clarifying the evidence for microbial- and plant-derived soil organic matter, and the path toward a more quantitative understanding. Glob. Change Biol. 00, 1–19 (2022).
  27. Buckeridge, K. M., Creamer, C. & Whitaker, J. Deconstructing the microbial necromass continuum to inform soil carbon sequestration. Funct. Ecol. 36, 1396–1410 (2022). · DOI
  28. Liang, C., Amelung, W., Lehmann, J. & Kästner, M. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3578–3590 (2019). · DOI
  29. Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L. & Cotrufo, M. F. Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 261–273 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Chang, Y. et al. A stoichiometric approach to estimate sources of mineral-associated soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 30, 1–14 (2024).
  31. Pausch, J. et al. Small but active – pool size does not matter for carbon incorporation in below-ground food webs. Funct. Ecol. 30, 479–489 (2016). · DOI
  32. Sokol, N. W. et al. Global distribution, formation and fate of mineral-associated soil organic matter under a changing climate: a trait-based perspective. Funct. Ecol. 36, 1411–1429 (2022). · DOI
  33. Prescott, C. E. & Vesterdal, L. Decomposition and transformations along the continuum from litter to soil organic matter in forest soils. Ecol. Manag. 498, 1–14 (2021). · DOI
  34. Witzgall, K. et al. Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–10 (2021). · DOI
  35. Kane, J. L., Kotcon, J. B., Freedman, Z. B. & Morrissey, E. M. Fungivorous nematodes drive microbial diversity and carbon cycling in soil. Ecology 104, e3844 (2023). · DOI
  36. Mielke, L. et al. Nematode grazing increases the allocation of plant-derived carbon to soil bacteria and saprophytic fungi, and activates bacterial species of the rhizosphere. Pedobiol. J. Soil Ecol. 90, 150787–150787 (2022).
  37. Wang, Y. et al. Protist size-dependent shifts of bacterial communities can reduce litter decomposition. ISME Commun. 5, ycaf231 (2025). · DOI
  38. Crowther, T. W. et al. Top-down control of soil fungal community composition by a globally distributed keystone consumer. Ecology 94, 2518–2528 (2013). · DOI
  39. Hannula, S. E., Jongen, R. & Morriën, E. Grazing by collembola controls fungal induced soil aggregation. Fungal Ecol. 65, 1–9 (2023). · DOI
  40. Schröter, D., Wolters, V. & de Ruiter, P. C. C and N mineralisation in the decomposer food webs of a European forest transect. Oikos 102, 294–308 (2003). · DOI
  41. Postma-Blaauw, M. B. et al. Within-trophic group interactions of bacterivorous nematode species and their effects on the bacterial community and nitrogen mineralization. Oecologia 142, 428–439 (2005). · DOI
  42. Crowther, T. W., Boddy, L. & Jones, T. H. Species-specific effects of soil fauna on fungal foraging and decomposition. Oecologia 167, 535–545 (2011). · DOI
  43. Bonkowski, M., Villenave, C. & Griffiths, B. Rhizosphere fauna: the functional and structural diversity of intimate interactions of soil fauna with plant roots. Plant Soil 321, 213–233 (2009). · DOI
  44. Sabatini, M. A. & Innocenti, G. Effects of Collembola on plant-pathogenic fungus interactions in simple experimental systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils 33, 62–66 (2001). · DOI
  45. de Vries, F. T. & Caruso, T. Eating from the same plate? Revisiting the role of labile carbon inputs in the soil food web. Soil Biol. Biochem 102, 4–9 (2016). · DOI
  46. Wardle, D. A. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 9, 870–886 (2006). · DOI
  47. Joly, F.-X. et al. Detritivore conversion of litter into faeces accelerates organic matter turnover. Commun. Biol. 3, 1–9 (2020). · DOI
  48. Heděnec, P. et al. Global distribution of soil fauna functional groups and their estimated litter consumption across biomes. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–14 (2022). · DOI
  49. Guidi, C. et al. Soil fauna drives vertical redistribution of soil organic carbon in a long-term irrigated dry pine forest. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 3145–3160 (2022). · DOI
  50. Tan, B. et al. Temperature and moisture modulate the contribution of soil fauna to litter decomposition via different pathways. Ecosystems 24, 1142–1156 (2021). · DOI
  51. Fujii, S., Makita, N., Mori, A. S. & Takeda, H. Plant species control and soil faunal involvement in the processes of above- and below-ground litter decomposition. Oikos 125, 883–892 (2016). · DOI
  52. Song, X. et al. The contributions of soil mesofauna to leaf and root litter decomposition of dominant plant species in grassland. Appl. Soil Ecol. 155, 1–8 (2020). · DOI
  53. Ulyshen, M. D. Wood decomposition as influenced by invertebrates. Biol. Rev. 91, 70–85 (2016). · DOI
  54. David, J. F. The role of litter-feeding macroarthropods in decomposition processes: a reappraisal of common views. Soil Biol. Biochem. 76, 109–118 (2014). · DOI
  55. Joly, F.-X., Coq, S., Coulis, M., Nahmani, J. & Hättenschwiler, S. Litter conversion into detritivore faeces reshuffles the quality control over C and N dynamics during decomposition. Funct. Ecol. 32, 2605–2614 (2018). · DOI
  56. Wickings, K. & Grandy, A. S. The oribatid mite Scheloribates moestus (Acari: Oribatida) alters litter chemistry and nutrient cycling during decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 351–358 (2011). · DOI
  57. Angst, G. et al. Earthworms act as biochemical reactors to convert labile plant compounds into stabilized soil microbial necromass. Commun. Biol. 2, 1–7 (2019). · DOI
  58. Vidal, A. et al. Earthworm cast formation and development: a shift from plant litter to mineral associated organic matter. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 1–15 (2019). · DOI
  59. Coq, S. et al. Faeces traits as unifying predictors of detritivore effects on organic matter turnover. Geoderma 422, 1–9 (2022). · DOI
  60. Roy, S. N. & Joy, V. C. Dietary effects of non-nutrients in the leaf litter of forest trees on assimilation, growth and tissue composition of the detritivorous soil arthropod Anoplodesmus saussurei (Humb.) (Polydesmida: Diplopoda). Appl. Soil Ecol. 43, 53–60 (2009). · DOI
  61. Coulis, M. et al. Functional dissimilarity across trophic levels as a driver of soil processes in a Mediterranean decomposer system exposed to two moisture levels. Oikos 124, 1304–1316 (2015). · DOI
  62. Cárcamo, H. A., Abe, T. A., Prescott, C. E., Holl, F. B. & Chanway, C. P. Influence of millipedes on litter decomposition, N mineralization, and microbial communities in a coastal forest in British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. Res. 30, 817–826 (2000). · DOI
  63. Hedlund, K. & Öhrn, M. S. Tritrophic interactions in a soil community enhance decomposition rates. Oikos 88, 585–591 (2000). · DOI
  64. Hogle, S. L., Hepolehto, I., Ruokolainen, L., Cairns, J. & Hiltunen, T. Effects of phenotypic variation on consumer coexistence and prey community structure. Ecol. Lett. 25, 307–319 (2022). · DOI
  65. Liu, S. et al. Functional redundancy dampens the trophic cascade effect of a web-building spider in a tropical forest floor. Soil Biol. Biochem. 98, 22–29 (2016). · DOI
  66. Schmitz, O. J. Effects of predator hunting mode on grassland ecosystem function. Science 319, 952–954 (2008). · DOI
  67. Thakur, M. P., van Groenigen, J. W., Kuiper, I. & De Deyn, G. B. Interactions between microbial-feeding and predatory soil fauna trigger N2O emissions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 70, 256–262 (2014). · DOI
  68. Lucas, J. M., McBride, S. G. & Strickland, M. S. Trophic level mediates soil microbial community composition and function. Soil Biol. Biochem. 143, 1–10 (2020). · DOI
  69. Lenoir, L., Persson, T., Bengtsson, J., Wallander, H. & Wirén, A. Bottom–up or top–down control in forest soil microcosms? Effects of soil fauna on fungal biomass and C/N mineralisation. Biol. Fertil. Soils 43, 281–294 (2007). · DOI
  70. Zaitsev, A. S., Birkhofer, K., Ekschmitt, K. & Wolters, V. Belowground tritrophic food chain modulates soil respiration in grasslands. Pedosphere 28, 114–123 (2018). · DOI
  71. Thakur, M. P. & Eisenhauer, N. Plant community composition determines the strength of top-down control in a soil food web motif. Sci. Rep. 5, 9134 (2015). · DOI
  72. Lang, B., Rall, B. C., Scheu, S. & Brose, U. Effects of environmental warming and drought on size-structured soil food webs. Oikos 123, 1224–1233 (2014). · DOI
  73. Adamczyk, M., Rüthi, J. & Frey, B. Root exudates increase soil respiration and alter microbial community structure in alpine permafrost and active layer soils. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 2152–2168 (2021). · DOI
  74. Gan, H. & Wickings, K. Root herbivory and soil carbon cycling: shedding “green” light onto a “brown” world. Soil Biol. Biochem. 150, 1–9 (2020). · DOI
  75. van der Putten, W. H., Vet, L. E. M., Harvey, J. A. & Wäckers, F. L. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 547–554 (2001). · DOI
  76. van der Putten, W. H. & van der Stoel, C. D. Plant parasitic nematodes and spatio-temporal variation in natural vegetation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10, 253–262 (1998). · DOI
  77. Wurst, S., Wagenaar, R., Biere, A. & van der Putten, W. H. Microorganisms and nematodes increase levels of secondary metabolites in roots and root exudates of Plantago lanceolata. Plant Soil 329, 117–126 (2010). · DOI
  78. Potapov, A. M., Tiunov, A. V. & Scheu, S. Uncovering trophic positions and food resources of soil animals using bulk natural stable isotope composition. Biol. Rev. 94, 37–59 (2019). · DOI
  79. Asplund, J., Bokhorst, S. & Wardle, D. A. Secondary compounds can reduce the soil micro-arthropod effect on lichen decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 66, 10–16 (2013). · DOI
  80. Bossuyt, H., Six, J. & Hendrix, P. F. Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 251–258 (2005). · DOI
  81. Jouquet, P., Dauber, J., Lagerlöf, J., Lavelle, P. & Lepage, M. Soil invertebrates as ecosystem engineers: intended and accidental effects on soil and feedback loops. Appl. Soil Ecol. 32, 153–164 (2006). · DOI
  82. Lavelle, P. Faunal activities and soil processes: adaptive strategies that determine ecosystem function. Adv. Ecol. Res. 27, 93–132 (1997). · DOI
  83. Ehrle, A., Kolle, O., Tischer, A., Trumbore, S. E. & Michalzik, B. Effects of mound building Lasius flavus on organic carbon and nutrient fluxes in soils of temperate grassland ecosystems. Pedobiologia 84, 1–13 (2021). · DOI
  84. Lejoly, J., Quideau, S. & Laganière, J. Invasive earthworms affect soil morphological features and carbon stocks in boreal forests. Geoderma 404, 1–13 (2021). · DOI
  85. Desie, E. et al. Positive feedback loop between earthworms, humus form and soil pH reinforces earthworm abundance in European forests. Funct. Ecol. 34, 2598–2610 (2020). · DOI
  86. Shuster, W. D., Subler, S. & McCoy, E. L. Foraging by deep-burrowing earthworms degrades surface soil structure of a fluventic Hapludoll in Ohio. Soil Tillage Res. 54, 179–189 (2000). · DOI
  87. Lejoly, J. et al. Effects of termite sheetings on soil properties under two contrasting soil management practices. Pedobiologia 76, 1–8 (2019). · DOI
  88. Le Mer, G. et al. Age matters: dynamics of earthworm casts and burrows produced by the anecic Amynthas khami and their effects on soil water infiltration. Geoderma 382, 114709 (2021). · DOI
  89. Frouz, J. & Jilková, V. The effect of ants on soil properties and processes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol N. 11, 191–199 (2008).
  90. Vion-Guibert, L. et al. The effects of earthworm species on organic matter transformations and soil microbial communities are only partially related to their bioturbation activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 199, 109606 (2024). · DOI
  91. Dang, H. X., Pham, Q. V., Tran, T. M., Rumpel, C. & Bottinelli, N. Earthworm impacts on soil carbon storage: the importance of quantifying all drilosphere compartments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 215, 106448 (2025). · DOI
  92. Chen, C., Singh, A. K., Yang, B., Wang, H. & Liu, W. Effect of termite mounds on soil microbial communities and microbial processes: Implications for soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. Geoderma 431, 1–11 (2023). · DOI
  93. Frouz, J. Plant-soil feedback across spatiotemporal scales from immediate effects to legacy. Soil Biol. Biochem. 189, 1–13 (2024). · DOI
  94. Harvey, G. L. et al. Global diversity and energy of animals shaping the Earth’s surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2415104122 (2025). · DOI
  95. Mujinya, B. B. et al. Spatial patterns and morphology of termite (Macrotermes falciger) mounds in the Upper Katanga, D.R. Congo. Catena 114, 97–106 (2014). · DOI
  96. Harit, A., Shanbhag, R., Chaudhary, E., Cheik, S. & Jouquet, P. Properties and functional impact of termite sheetings. Biol. Fertil. Soils 53, 743–749 (2017). · DOI
  97. Sitters, J. & Olde Venterink, H. The need for a novel integrative theory on feedbacks between herbivores, plants and soil nutrient cycling. Plant Soil 396, 421–426 (2015). · DOI
  98. Barton, P. S. et al. Towards quantifying carrion biomass in ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 950–961 (2019). · DOI
  99. El-Ayouty, E. Y., Ghabbour, S. I. & El-Sayyed, N. A. M. Rôle of litter and the excreta of soil fauna in the nitrogen status of desert soils. J. Arid Environ. 1, 145–155 (1978). · DOI
  100. Frouz, J., Novotná, K., Čermáková, L. & Pivokonský, M. Soil fauna reduce soil respiration by supporting N leaching from litter. Appl. Soil Ecol. 153, 1–8 (2020). · DOI
  101. Zang, H., Wang, J. & Kuzyakov, Y. N fertilization decreases soil organic matter decomposition in the rhizosphere. Appl. Soil Ecol. 108, 47–53 (2016). · DOI
  102. Guhra, T., Stolze, K., Schweizer, S. & Totsche, K. U. Earthworm mucus contributes to the formation of organo-mineral associations in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 145, 1–10 (2020). · DOI
  103. Chertov, O. G. Quantification of soil fauna metabolites and dead mass as humification sources in forest soils. Eurasia. Soil Sci. 49, 77–88 (2016). · DOI
  104. Frost, C. J. & Hunter, M. D. Insect canopy herbivory and frass deposition affect soil nutrient dynamics and export in oak mesocosms. Ecology 85, 3335–3347 (2004). · DOI
  105. Kos, M. et al. After-life effects: living and dead invertebrates differentially affect plants and their associated above- and belowground multitrophic communities. Oikos 126, 888–899 (2017). · DOI
  106. Lin, J. et al. Earthworms exert long lasting afterlife effects on soil microbial communities. Geoderma 420, 115906–115906 (2022). · DOI
  107. Crotty, F. V. & Adl, S. M. Competition and predation in soil fungivorous microarthropods using stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1–10 (2019). · DOI
  108. Seastedt, T. R. & Tate, C. M. Decomposition rates and nutrient contents of arthropod remains in forest litter. Ecology 62, 13–19 (1981). · DOI
  109. Bastow, J. L. Facilitation and predation structure a grassland detrital food web: the responses of soil nematodes to isopod processing of litter. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 947–957 (2011). · DOI
  110. D’Hervilly, C. & Frouz, J. Interactions between litter-feeders and the burrowing earthworm A. caliginosa do not affect mineral-associated C addition in recent spoil material. Appl. Soil Ecol. 218, 106687 (2026). · DOI
  111. Lubbers, I. M., Berg, M. P., De Deyn, G. B., van der Putten, W. H. & van Groenigen, J. W. Soil fauna diversity increases CO2 but suppresses N2O emissions from soil. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1886–1898 (2020). · DOI
  112. Phillips, H. R. P. et al. Global distribution of earthworm diversity. Science 366, 480–485 (2019). · DOI
  113. Potapov, A. M. et al. Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails. Nat. Commun. 14, 674 (2023). · DOI
  114. van den Hoogen, J. et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature 572, 194–198 (2019). · DOI
  115. Irshad, S. & Frouz, J. How the effect of earthworms on soil organic matter mineralization and stabilization is affected by litter quality and stage of soil development. Biogeochemistry 167, 1425–1436 (2024). · DOI
  116. Wright, D. A., Killham, K., Glover, L. A. & Prosser, J. I. Role of pore size location in determining bacterial activity during predation by protozoa in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 3537–3543 (1995). · DOI
  117. Erktan, A., Or, D. & Scheu, S. The physical structure of soil: determinant and consequence of trophic interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 148, 107876 (2020). · DOI
  118. Sokol, N. W., Sanderman, J. & Bradford, M. A. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 12–24 (2019). · DOI
  119. Angst, G., Mueller, K. E., Nierop, K. G. J. & Simpson, M. J. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 156, 108189 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  120. Soares, M. & Rousk, J. Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: Links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. Soil Biol. Biochem. 131, 195–205 (2019). · DOI
  121. Ostle, N. et al. Isotopic detection of recent photosynthate carbon flow into grassland rhizosphere fauna. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 768–777 (2007). · DOI
  122. Bernier, N. Hotspots of biodiversity in the underground: A matter of humus form? Appl. Soil Ecol. 123, 305–312 (2018). · DOI
  123. Liu, J., Li, F., Tian, T. & Xiao, H. Unraveling the influence of litter identity, diversity and rhizodeposition on nematode communities. Plant Soil 505, 63–777 (2024). · DOI
  124. Burtis, J. C., Pipes, G. T. & Yavitt, J. B. How do soil fauna mediate leaf litter decomposition in north temperate forest ecosystems? Pedobiologia 105, 150975 (2024). · DOI
  125. Liao, J. et al. Earthworms regulate soil microbial and plant residues through decomposition. Geoderma 450, 117040 (2024). · DOI
  126. Soong, J. L. & Nielsen, U. N. The role of microarthropods in emerging models of soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 102, 37–39 (2016). · DOI
  127. Song, C. et al. Land use determines the composition and stability of organic carbon in earthworm casts under tropical conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 190, 109291 (2024). · DOI
  128. Kaspari, M. & Yanoviak, S. P. Biogeochemistry and the structure of tropical brown food webs. Ecology 90, 3342–3351 (2009). · DOI
  129. Elek, Z., Růžičková, J. & Ódor, P. Functional plasticity of carabids can presume better the changes in community composition than taxon-based descriptors. Ecol. Appl. 32, e02460 (2022). · DOI
  130. Post, D. M., Pace, M. L. & Hairston, N. G. Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes. Nature 405, 1047–1049 (2000). · DOI
  131. Fox, O., Vetter, S., Ekschmitt, K. & Wolters, V. Soil fauna modifies the recalcitrance-persistence relationship of soil carbon pools. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 1353–1363 (2006). · DOI
  132. Joly, F.-X., Coq, S. & Subke, J.-A. Soil fauna precipitate the convergence of organic matter quality during decomposition. Oikos e09497, 1–10 (2022).
  133. Jochum, M. et al. For flux’s sake: general considerations for energy-flux calculations in ecological communities. Ecol. Evol. 11, 12948–12969 (2021). · DOI
  134. Osler, G. H. R. & Sommerkorn, M. Toward a complete soil C and N cycle: Incorporating the soil fauna. Ecology 88, 1611–1621 (2007). · DOI
  135. Frouz, J. Effects of soil macro- and mesofauna on litter decomposition and soil organic matter stabilization. Geoderma 332, 161–172 (2018). · DOI
  136. Salazar-Fillippo, A. A. et al. Effects of microarthropod density on soil fungal community composition in nutrient-poor ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 39, 432–445 (2025). · DOI
  137. Jiang, Y. et al. Nematodes and their bacterial prey improve phosphorus acquisition by wheat. N. Phytol. 237, 974–986 (2023). · DOI
  138. Ngosong, C., Gabriel, E. & Ruess, L. Collembola grazing on arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi modulates nutrient allocation in plants. Pedobiologia 57, 171–179 (2014). · DOI
  139. Steinaker, D. F. & Wilson, S. D. Scale and density dependent relationships among roots, mycorrhizal fungi and collembola in grassland and forest. Oikos 117, 703–710 (2008). · DOI
  140. Crowther, T. W., Boddy, L. & Hefin Jones, T. Functional and ecological consequences of saprotrophic fungus-grazer interactions. ISME J. 6, 1992–2001 (2012). · DOI
  141. Thakur, M. P. et al. Cascading effects of belowground predators on plant communities are density-dependent. Ecol. Evol. 5, 4300–4314 (2015). · DOI
  142. Lundberg, J. & Moberg, F. Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6, 0087–0098 (2003). · DOI
  143. Reddell, P. & Spain, A. V. Earthworms as vectors of viable propagules of mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 767–774 (1991). · DOI
  144. Thorpe, I. S., Killham, K., Prosser, J. I. & Glover, L. A. The role of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris in the transport of bacterial inocula through soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 23, 132–139 (1996). · DOI
  145. Monteux, S., Mariën, J. & Krab, E. J. Dispersal of bacteria and stimulation of permafrost decomposition by Collembola. Biogeosciences 19, 4089–4105 (2022). · DOI
  146. Vašutová, M. et al. Taxi drivers: the role of animals in transporting mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 29, 413–434 (2019). · DOI
  147. van Sluijs, L. et al. Nematodes vector bacteriophages in compost and soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 205, 109785 (2025). · DOI
  148. Wu, A. et al. Changes in litter chemical properties mediate the effects of soil arthropods on the microbial community during litter decomposition in a subalpine forest. Appl. Soil Ecol. 217, 106578 (2026). · DOI
  149. Shi, J.-H. et al. Earthworms promote crop growth by enhancing the connections among soil microbial communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 1867–1880 (2024). · DOI
  150. Rousk, J. Biomass or growth? How to measure soil food webs to understand structure and function. Soil Biol. Biochem. 102, 45–47 (2016). · DOI
  151. Buchkowski, R. W., Schmitz, O. J. & Bradford, M. A. Microbial stoichiometry overrides biomass as a regulator of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. Ecology 96, 11 (2015). · DOI
  152. Rizzuto, M., Leroux, S. J. & Schmitz, O. J. Rewiring the carbon cycle: a theoretical framework for animal-driven ecosystem carbon sequestration. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 129, e2024JG008026 (2024). · DOI
  153. Elser, J. J. et al. Growth rate–stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol. Lett. 6, 936–943 (2003). · DOI
  154. Hessen, D. O. et al. Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology 85, 1179–1192 (2004). · DOI
  155. Prescott, C. E. Do rates of litter decomposition tell us anything we really need to know? Ecol. Manag. 220, 66–74 (2005). · DOI
  156. Frouz, J., Roubíčková, A., Heděnec, P. & Tajovský, K. Do soil fauna really hasten litter decomposition? A meta-analysis of enclosure studies. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 68, 18–24 (2015). · DOI
  157. Boulanger, Y. et al. Climate change impacts on forest landscapes along the Canadian southern boreal forest transition zone. Landsc. Ecol. 32, 1415–1431 (2017). · DOI
  158. Kurz, W. A. et al. Carbon in Canada’s boreal forest — A synthesis. Environ. Rev. 292, 260–292 (2013). · DOI
  159. Krause, A. et al. Shift in trophic niches of soil microarthropods with conversion of tropical rainforest into plantations as indicated by stable isotopes (15N, 13C). PLOS ONE 14, e0224520 (2019). · DOI
  160. Schwarz, B. et al. Warming alters energetic structure and function but not resilience of soil food webs. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 895–900 (2017). · DOI
  161. Yin, R. et al. Warmer temperature promotes the contribution of invertebrate fauna to litter components release in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. CATENA 231, 107334 (2023). · DOI
  162. Han, X. et al. Warming decreased plant litter decomposition by modulating soil fauna interactions in a Tibetan alpine meadow. Sci. Total Environ. 954, 176332 (2024). · DOI
  163. Dahl, M. B. et al. Long-term warming-induced trophic downgrading in the soil microbial food web. Soil Biol. Biochem. 181, 109044 (2023). · DOI
  164. Sünnemann, M. et al. Sustainable land use strengthens microbial and herbivore controls in soil food webs in current and future climates. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17554 (2024). · DOI
  165. Blankinship, J. C., Niklaus, P. A. & Hungate, B. A. A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change. Oecologia 165, 553–565 (2011). · DOI
  166. Meehan, M. L. et al. Response of soil fauna to simulated global change factors depends on ambient climate conditions. Pedobiologia 83, 150672 (2020). · DOI
  167. Aupic-Samain, A. et al. Water availability rather than temperature control soil fauna community structure and prey–predator interactions. Funct. Ecol. 35, 1550–1559 (2021). · DOI
  168. Schlüter, S., Gil, E., Doniger, T., Applebaum, I. & Steinberger, Y. Abundance and community composition of free-living nematodes as a function of soil structure under different vineyard managements. Appl. Soil Ecol. 170, 104291 (2022). · DOI
  169. Lang, B., Ehnes, R. B., Brose, U. & Rall, B. C. Temperature and consumer type dependencies of energy flows in natural communities. Oikos 126, 1717–1725 (2017). · DOI
  170. Pérez-Izquierdo, L. et al. Impacts of canopy disturbances by tree logging on soil biota increase with organism size. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70287 (2025). · DOI
  171. Blume-Werry, G., Klaminder, J., Krab, E. J. & Monteux, S. Ideas and perspectives: alleviation of functional limitations by soil organisms is key to climate feedbacks from arctic soils. Biogeosciences 20, 1979–1990 (2023). · DOI
  172. Crowther, T. W., Jones, T. H., Boddy, L. & Baldrian, P. Invertebrate grazing determines enzyme production by basidiomycete fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem 43, 2060–2068 (2011). · DOI
  173. Gómez-Brandón, M., Lazcano, C., Lores, M. & Domínguez, J. Detritivorous earthworms modify microbial community structure and accelerate plant residue decomposition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 44, 237–244 (2010). · DOI
  174. Des Marteaux, L. E., Kullik, S. A., Habash, M. & Schmidt, J. M. Terrestrial isopods Porcellio scaber and Oniscus asellus (Crustacea: Isopoda) increase bacterial abundance and modify microbial community structure in leaf litter microcosms: a short-term decomposition study. Microb. Ecol. 80, 690–702 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  175. Wang, S. et al. Earthworms increase soil carbon dioxide emissions through changing microbial community structure and activity under high nitrogen addition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 196, 105297 (2024). · DOI
  176. Yang, X., Shao, M. & Li, T. Effects of terrestrial isopods on soil nutrients during litter decomposition. Geoderma 376, 114546 (2020). · DOI
  177. Digel, C., Curtsdotter, A., Riede, J., Klarner, B. & Brose, U. Unravelling the complex structure of forest soil food webs: higher omnivory and more trophic levels. Oikos 123, 1157–1172 (2014). · DOI
  178. Potapov, A. M. et al. Feeding habits and multifunctional classification of soil-associated consumers from protists to vertebrates. Biol. Rev. 97, 1057–1117 (2022). · DOI
  179. Wolkovich, E. M. Reticulated channels in soil food webs. Soil Biol. Biochem. 102, 18–21 (2016). · DOI
  180. Korotkevich, A. Y., Potapov, A. M., Tiunov, A. V. & Kuznetsova, N. A. Collapse of trophic-niche structure in belowground communities under anthropogenic disturbance. Ecosphere 9, e02528 (2018). · DOI
  181. Gan, H., Zak, D. R. & Hunter, M. D. Trophic stability of soil oribatid mites in the face of environmental change. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 71–77 (2014). · DOI
  182. Pollierer, M. M. & Scheu, S. Stable isotopes of amino acids indicate that soil decomposer microarthropods predominantly feed on saprotrophic fungi. Ecosphere 12, e03425 (2021). · DOI
  183. Lux, J. et al. Trophic positions of soil microarthropods in forests increase with elevation, but energy channels remain unchanged. Ecosphere 15, e4747 (2024). · DOI
  184. Lejoly, J. et al. Earthworm-invaded boreal forest soils harbour distinct microbial communities. Soil 9, 461–478 (2023). · DOI
  185. Blume-Werry, G. et al. Invasive earthworms unlock arctic plant nitrogen limitation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–10 (2020). · DOI
  186. Hale, C. M., Frelich, L. E. & Reich, P. B. Changes in hardwood forest understory plant communities in response to European earthworm invasions. Ecology 87, 1637–1649 (2006). · DOI
  187. Jochum, M. et al. Earthworm invasion causes declines across soil fauna size classes and biodiversity facets in northern North American forests. Oikos 130, 766–780 (2021). · DOI
  188. McAdams, B. N., Quideau, S. A., Swallow, M. J. B., Lejoly, J. & Lumley, L. M. The influence of nonnative earthworms (Annelida: Crassiclitellata: Lumbricidae) on oribatid mite communities in a boreal forest stand. Can. Entomol. 157, e22 (2025). · DOI
  189. Jochum, M. et al. Aboveground impacts of a belowground invader: how invasive earthworms alter aboveground arthropod communities in a northern North American forest. Biol. Lett. 18, 1–7 (2021).
  190. Qiu, Y. et al. Field experiment reveals varied earthworm densities boost soil organic carbon more than they increase carbon dioxide emissions. Geoderma 456, 117251 (2025). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lejoly, J. D. M., Mason-Jones, K., & Veen, G. F. C.
Affiliations
Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NL)
Corresponding author
Lejoly, Justine D. M.
ORCID
Venue
Communications Earth & Environment
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2026-02-28
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
322-322
ISSN
2662-4435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4
PMC
PMC13065481
OpenAlex
W7132851949
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 16
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Communications Earth & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (101105509)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (521889691)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Research Executive Agency
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
soil fauna, soil food webs, soil organic matter turnover, soil carbon cycling, element cycling, bioturbation, herbivory, detritivory, predation, global change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A soil food web approach to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4
The paper
Lejoly, J. D. M., Mason-Jones, K., & Veen, G. F. C. (2026). A soil food web approach to integrate soil fauna into multitrophic biogeochemistry. Communications Earth & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03322-4