Cited by 107

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology

Fortin, Marie-Josée, James, Patrick M.A., MacKenzie, Alistair, Melles, Stephanie J., Rayfield, Bronwyn·2012·Spatial Statistics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spasta.2012.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Agrawal, 2007, Filling key gaps in population and community ecology, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 145, 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[145:FKGIPA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  2. Angelone, 2011, Where movement happens: scale-dependent landscape effects on genetic differentiation in the European tree frog, Ecography, 34, 714, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06494.x · DOI
  3. Beale, 2010, Regression analysis of spatial data, Ecology Letters, 13, 246, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01422.x · DOI
  4. Beier, 2011, Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps, Conservation Biology, 25, 879, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bellier, 2007, Identifying spatial relationships at multiple scales: principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) and geostatistical approaches, Ecography, 30, 385, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.04911.x · DOI
  6. Bélisle, 2002, Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models, Landscape Ecology, 17, 219, 10.1023/A:1020260326889 · DOI
  7. Bini, 2009, Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression, Ecography, 32, 193, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05717.x · DOI
  8. Boscolo, 2008, Importance of interhabitat gaps and stepping-stones for lesser woodcreepers (Xiphorhynchus fuscus) in the Atlantic forest, Brazil, Biotropica, 40, 273, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00409.x · DOI
  9. Corlatti, 2009, Ability of wildlife overpasses to provide connectivity and prevent genetic isolation, Conservation Biology, 23, 548, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01162.x · DOI
  10. Corstanje, 2008, Inferences from fluctuations in the local variogram about the assumption of stationarity in the variance, Geoderma, 143, 123, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.10.021 · DOI
  11. Csillag, 2002, Wavelets, boundaries, and the spatial analysis of landscape pattern, Écoscience, 9, 177, 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682704 · DOI
  12. Currie, 2007, Disentangling the roles of environment and space in ecology, Journal of Biogeography, 34, 2009, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01808.x · DOI
  13. Cushman, 2006, Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling, American Naturalist, 168, 486, 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dale, 2002, The conceptual and mathematical relationships among methods for spatial analysis, Ecography, 25, 558, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250506.x · DOI
  15. Dale, 2010, From graphs to spatial graphs, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 21, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144718 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dale, 1998, The use of wavelets for spatial pattern analysis in ecology, Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 805, 10.2307/3237046 · DOI
  17. Desrochers, 2011, Integrating GIS and homing experiments to study avian movement costs, Landscape Ecology, 26, 47, 10.1007/s10980-010-9532-8 · DOI
  18. Diggle, D.J., Ribeiro, P.J., 2010. Model-Based Geostatistics, in: Springer Series in Statistics, New York, p. 240.
  19. Diggle, 1998, Model-based geostatistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 47, 299, 10.1111/1467-9876.00113 · DOI
  20. Dormann, 2007, Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review, Ecography, 30, 609, 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dray, 2006, Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM), Ecological Modelling, 196, 483, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 · DOI
  22. Dungan, 2002, A balanced view of scaling in spatial statistical analysis, Ecography, 25, 626, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x · DOI
  23. Ewers, 2006, Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation, Biological Reviews, 81, 117, 10.1017/S1464793105006949 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fahrig, 2003, Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Fall, 2007, Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity, Ecosystem, 10, 448, 10.1007/s10021-007-9038-7 · DOI
  26. Fischer, 2007, Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 265, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x · DOI
  27. Fortin, 2009, Spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies: a legacy of solutions and myths, Geographical Analysis, 41, 392, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00766.x · DOI
  28. Garroway, 2011, Using a genetic network to parameterize a landscape resistance surface for fishers Martes pennanti, Molecular Ecology, 20, 3978, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05243.x · DOI
  29. Griffith, 2006, Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses in exploiting relative location information, Ecology, 87, 2603, 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. Haddad, 2000, Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, Junonia coenia, Conservation Biology, 14, 738, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99041.x · DOI
  31. Hanski, 2011, Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments, Ecology Letters, 14, 1025, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01671.x · DOI
  32. Haskard, 2009, Modeling non-stationarity variance of soil properties by tempering an empirical spectrum, Geoderma, 153, 18, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.07.006 · DOI
  33. Hassler, 2011, Exploring the variation in soil saturated hydraulic conductivity under a tropical rainforest using the wavelet transform, European Journal of Soil Science, 62, 891, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01400.x · DOI
  34. Hengl, 2007, About regression-kriging: from equations to case studies, Computers and Geosciences, 33, 1301, 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001 · DOI
  35. Hengl, 2004, A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging, Geoderma, 120, 75, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.08.018 · DOI
  36. Jacobi, 2011, Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix, Ecological Applications, 21, 1861, 10.1890/10-0915.1 · DOI
  37. James, 2010, Identifying significant scale-specific spatial boundaries using wavelets and null models: spruce budworm defoliation in Ontario, Canada as a case study, Landscape Ecology, 25, 873, 10.1007/s10980-010-9465-2 · DOI
  38. James, 2011, Spatial genetic structure of a symbiotic beetle–fungal system: toward multi-taxa integrated landscape genetics, PLoS ONE, 6, e25359, 10.1371/journal.pone.0025359 · DOI
  39. James, 2011, Two-dimensional wavelet analysis of spruce budworm host basal area in the Border Lakes landscape, Ecological Applications, 21, 2197, 10.1890/09-1876.1 · DOI
  40. Jombart, 2009, Finding essential scales of spatial variation in ecological data: a multivariate approach, Ecography, 32, 161, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05567.x · DOI
  41. Keitt, 2005, Scale-specific inference using wavelet, Ecology, 86, 2497, 10.1890/04-1016 · DOI
  42. Laita, 2011, Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity?, Landscape Ecology, 26, 951, 10.1007/s10980-011-9620-4 · DOI
  43. Lark, 2001, Changes in variance and correlation of soil properties with scale and location: analysis using an adapted maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform, European Journal of Soil Science, 52, 547, 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00420.x · DOI
  44. Lees, 2009, Gap-crossing movements predict species occupancy in Amazonian forest fragments, Oikos, 118, 280, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16842.x · DOI
  45. Levin, 1992, The problem of pattern and scale in ecology, Ecology, 73, 1943, 10.2307/1941447 · DOI
  46. McIntire, 2009, Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns, Ecology, 90, 46, 10.1890/07-2096.1 · DOI
  47. Pascual-Hortal, 2008, Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest planning through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain), European Journal of Forest Research, 127, 23, 10.1007/s10342-006-0165-z · DOI
  48. Peres-Neto, 2010, Estimating and controlling for spatial autocorrelation in the study of ecological communities, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 174, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00506.x · DOI
  49. Philibert, 2008, Spatial structure effects on the detection of patches boundaries using local operators, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 15, 447, 10.1007/s10651-007-0061-9 · DOI
  50. Rayfield, 2010, The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values, Landscape Ecology, 25, 519, 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Rayfield, 2011, Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify habitat network statistics, Ecology, 92, 847, 10.1890/09-2190.1 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Real, 2007, Spatial dynamics and genetics of infectious diseases on heterogeneous landscapes, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4, 935, 10.1098/rsif.2007.1041 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Richard, 2010, Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data, Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 603, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01806.x · DOI
  54. Saura, 2009, Conefor sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity, Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 135, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005 · DOI
  55. Torrence, 1998, A practical guide to wavelet analysis, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79, 61, 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  56. Treml, 2008, Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation, Landscape Ecology, 23, 19, 10.1007/s10980-007-9138-y · DOI
  57. Urban, 2001, Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective, Ecology, 82, 1205, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  58. Urban, 2009, Graph models of habitat mosaics, Ecology Letters, 12, 260, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01271.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. Wagner, 2005, Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics, Ecology, 86, 1975, 10.1890/04-0914 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fortin, M.-J., James, P. M. A., MacKenzie, A., Melles, S. J., & Rayfield, B.
Venue
Spatial Statistics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
1
Pages
100-109
ISSN
2211-6753
Cited by
107
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review