The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large and growing number of studies employ network-based connectivity models representing a landscape as high-quality habitat nodes with links connecting pairs of nodes if movement is possible between them.
“A large and growing number of studies employ network-based connectivity models, in which a landscape is represented as a set of high-quality habitat nodes, with links connecting pairs of nodes if movement is possible between them [12]–[17].”
From Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- Agrawal, 2007, Filling key gaps in population and community ecology, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 145, 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[145:FKGIPA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Angelone, 2011, Where movement happens: scale-dependent landscape effects on genetic differentiation in the European tree frog, Ecography, 34, 714, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06494.x · DOI
- Beale, 2010, Regression analysis of spatial data, Ecology Letters, 13, 246, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01422.x · DOI
- Beier, 2011, Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps, Conservation Biology, 25, 879, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
- Bellier, 2007, Identifying spatial relationships at multiple scales: principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) and geostatistical approaches, Ecography, 30, 385, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.04911.x · DOI
- Bélisle, 2002, Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models, Landscape Ecology, 17, 219, 10.1023/A:1020260326889 · DOI
- Bini, 2009, Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression, Ecography, 32, 193, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05717.x · DOI
- Boscolo, 2008, Importance of interhabitat gaps and stepping-stones for lesser woodcreepers (Xiphorhynchus fuscus) in the Atlantic forest, Brazil, Biotropica, 40, 273, 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00409.x · DOI
- Corlatti, 2009, Ability of wildlife overpasses to provide connectivity and prevent genetic isolation, Conservation Biology, 23, 548, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01162.x · DOI
- Corstanje, 2008, Inferences from fluctuations in the local variogram about the assumption of stationarity in the variance, Geoderma, 143, 123, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.10.021 · DOI
- Csillag, 2002, Wavelets, boundaries, and the spatial analysis of landscape pattern, Écoscience, 9, 177, 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682704 · DOI
- Currie, 2007, Disentangling the roles of environment and space in ecology, Journal of Biogeography, 34, 2009, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01808.x · DOI
- Cushman, 2006, Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling, American Naturalist, 168, 486, 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
- Dale, 2002, The conceptual and mathematical relationships among methods for spatial analysis, Ecography, 25, 558, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250506.x · DOI
- Dale, 2010, From graphs to spatial graphs, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 21, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144718 · DOI · Paper page
- Dale, 1998, The use of wavelets for spatial pattern analysis in ecology, Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 805, 10.2307/3237046 · DOI
- Desrochers, 2011, Integrating GIS and homing experiments to study avian movement costs, Landscape Ecology, 26, 47, 10.1007/s10980-010-9532-8 · DOI
- Diggle, D.J., Ribeiro, P.J., 2010. Model-Based Geostatistics, in: Springer Series in Statistics, New York, p. 240.
- Diggle, 1998, Model-based geostatistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 47, 299, 10.1111/1467-9876.00113 · DOI
- Dormann, 2007, Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review, Ecography, 30, 609, 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · DOI · Paper page
- Dray, 2006, Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM), Ecological Modelling, 196, 483, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 · DOI
- Dungan, 2002, A balanced view of scaling in spatial statistical analysis, Ecography, 25, 626, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x · DOI
- Ewers, 2006, Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation, Biological Reviews, 81, 117, 10.1017/S1464793105006949 · DOI · Paper page
- Fahrig, 2003, Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · DOI · Paper page
- Fall, 2007, Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity, Ecosystem, 10, 448, 10.1007/s10021-007-9038-7 · DOI
- Fischer, 2007, Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 265, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x · DOI
- Fortin, 2009, Spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies: a legacy of solutions and myths, Geographical Analysis, 41, 392, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00766.x · DOI
- Garroway, 2011, Using a genetic network to parameterize a landscape resistance surface for fishers Martes pennanti, Molecular Ecology, 20, 3978, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05243.x · DOI
- Griffith, 2006, Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses in exploiting relative location information, Ecology, 87, 2603, 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:SMIETF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Haddad, 2000, Corridor length and patch colonization by a butterfly, Junonia coenia, Conservation Biology, 14, 738, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99041.x · DOI
- Hanski, 2011, Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments, Ecology Letters, 14, 1025, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01671.x · DOI
- Haskard, 2009, Modeling non-stationarity variance of soil properties by tempering an empirical spectrum, Geoderma, 153, 18, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.07.006 · DOI
- Hassler, 2011, Exploring the variation in soil saturated hydraulic conductivity under a tropical rainforest using the wavelet transform, European Journal of Soil Science, 62, 891, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01400.x · DOI
- Hengl, 2007, About regression-kriging: from equations to case studies, Computers and Geosciences, 33, 1301, 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001 · DOI
- Hengl, 2004, A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging, Geoderma, 120, 75, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.08.018 · DOI
- Jacobi, 2011, Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix, Ecological Applications, 21, 1861, 10.1890/10-0915.1 · DOI
- James, 2010, Identifying significant scale-specific spatial boundaries using wavelets and null models: spruce budworm defoliation in Ontario, Canada as a case study, Landscape Ecology, 25, 873, 10.1007/s10980-010-9465-2 · DOI
- James, 2011, Spatial genetic structure of a symbiotic beetle–fungal system: toward multi-taxa integrated landscape genetics, PLoS ONE, 6, e25359, 10.1371/journal.pone.0025359 · DOI
- James, 2011, Two-dimensional wavelet analysis of spruce budworm host basal area in the Border Lakes landscape, Ecological Applications, 21, 2197, 10.1890/09-1876.1 · DOI
- Jombart, 2009, Finding essential scales of spatial variation in ecological data: a multivariate approach, Ecography, 32, 161, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05567.x · DOI
- Keitt, 2005, Scale-specific inference using wavelet, Ecology, 86, 2497, 10.1890/04-1016 · DOI
- Laita, 2011, Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity?, Landscape Ecology, 26, 951, 10.1007/s10980-011-9620-4 · DOI
- Lark, 2001, Changes in variance and correlation of soil properties with scale and location: analysis using an adapted maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform, European Journal of Soil Science, 52, 547, 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00420.x · DOI
- Lees, 2009, Gap-crossing movements predict species occupancy in Amazonian forest fragments, Oikos, 118, 280, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16842.x · DOI
- Levin, 1992, The problem of pattern and scale in ecology, Ecology, 73, 1943, 10.2307/1941447 · DOI
- McIntire, 2009, Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns, Ecology, 90, 46, 10.1890/07-2096.1 · DOI
- Pascual-Hortal, 2008, Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest planning through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain), European Journal of Forest Research, 127, 23, 10.1007/s10342-006-0165-z · DOI
- Peres-Neto, 2010, Estimating and controlling for spatial autocorrelation in the study of ecological communities, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 174, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00506.x · DOI
- Philibert, 2008, Spatial structure effects on the detection of patches boundaries using local operators, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 15, 447, 10.1007/s10651-007-0061-9 · DOI
- Rayfield, 2010, The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values, Landscape Ecology, 25, 519, 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Rayfield, 2011, Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify habitat network statistics, Ecology, 92, 847, 10.1890/09-2190.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Real, 2007, Spatial dynamics and genetics of infectious diseases on heterogeneous landscapes, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4, 935, 10.1098/rsif.2007.1041 · DOI · Paper page
- Richard, 2010, Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data, Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 603, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01806.x · DOI
- Saura, 2009, Conefor sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity, Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 135, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005 · DOI
- Torrence, 1998, A practical guide to wavelet analysis, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79, 61, 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Treml, 2008, Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation, Landscape Ecology, 23, 19, 10.1007/s10980-007-9138-y · DOI
- Urban, 2001, Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective, Ecology, 82, 1205, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Urban, 2009, Graph models of habitat mosaics, Ecology Letters, 12, 260, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01271.x · DOI · Paper page
- Wagner, 2005, Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics, Ecology, 86, 1975, 10.1890/04-0914 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fortin, M.-J., James, P. M. A., MacKenzie, A., Melles, S. J., & Rayfield, B.
- Venue
- Spatial Statistics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 100-109
- ISSN
- 2211-6753
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review