The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular Economy in the WEEE industry: a systematic literature review and a research agenda
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the majority of CE studies primarily examine the environmental impact and economic benefits of recycle and reduce strategies, while the most significant opportunities for decreasing environmental impact and resource consumption, circling around reuse, repair, and remanufacturing, still remain underutilized [7,8].”
From Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Napper, I. E., & Thompson, R. C. (2016) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025 · Cited by 1,799
Targets for a circular economy
Morseletto, P. (2019) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553 · Cited by 1,651
How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · Cited by 1,544
Conducting content‐analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management
Seuring, S. A., & Gold, S. (2012) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211258609 · Cited by 1,352
Towards a consensus on the circular economy
Prieto‐Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Ormazábal, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · Cited by 1,293
The history and current applications of the circular economy concept
Winans, K. S., Kendall, A. M., & Deng, H. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123 · Cited by 1,212
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Allwood, 2014, Squaring the Circular Economy: The Role of Recycling within a Hierarchy of Material Management Strategies, Handbook of Recycling: State-of-the-art for Practitioners, Analysts, and Scientists
- Atasu, 2013, How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice? Prod. Oper, Manag, 22, 991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pan, X., Wong, C. W. Y., & Li, C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132671 · Cited by 188
An introduction to circular economy and sustainability: Some existing lessons and future directions
Nikolaou, I. E., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.017 · Cited by 178
Towards the Smart Circular Economy Paradigm: A Definition, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda
Bressanelli, G., Adrodegari, F., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Parida, V. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14094960 · Cited by 209
Self-citationRamprasad, C., Gwenzi, W., Chaukura, N., Azelee, N. I. W., Rajapaksha, A. U., Naushad, M., & Selvasembian, R. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.135992 · Cited by 166
Circular Economy and the evolution of industrial districts: a supply chain perspective
Bressanelli, G., Visintin, F., & Saccani, N. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108348 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bressanelli, G., Saccani, N., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Perona, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Brescia (IT)
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bressanelli, Gianmarco
- Venue
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 174-188
- ISSN
- 2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3032698782
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainable Production and Consumption (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- circular economy, electronic waste, remanufacturing, recycling, reuse, REDUCE, research gaps, sustainability, resource consumption, waste generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
