CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supporting a circular economy: Insights from Taiwan's plastic waste sector and lessons for developing countries

Wu, Ching-Yan, Hu, Mei-Chih, Ni, Fu-Chuan·2021·Sustainable Production and Consumption
DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009PMC PMC7547840
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abramovitz, 1986, 46, 385
  2. Awasthi, 2016, Comparative examining and analysis of e-waste recycling in typical developing and developed countries, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 676, 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.065 · DOI
  3. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research, 9th edition. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
  4. Baker, 2005, Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329, 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 · DOI
  5. Barr, 2004, What we buy, what we throw away and how we use our voice. Sustainable household waste management in the UK, Sustainable Development, 12, 32, 10.1002/sd.226 · DOI
  6. Bor, 2004, The market-incentive recycling system for waste packaging containers in Taiwan, Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 509, 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.07.002 · DOI
  7. Boxenbaum, 2011, New Knowledge Products As Bricolage: Metaphors and Scripts in Organizational Theory, Academy of Management Review, 36, 272
  8. Bradbury-Huang, 2010, What is good action research? Why the resurgent interest, Action Research, 8, 93, 10.1177/1476750310362435 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brydon-Miller, 2003, Why action research, Action Research, 1, 9, 10.1177/14767503030011002 · DOI
  10. Ciborra, 1996, The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures and surprises, Organization Science, 7, 103, 10.1287/orsc.7.2.103 · DOI
  11. Coughlan, 2002, Action research for operations management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22, 220, 10.1108/01443570210417515 · DOI
  12. Chou, 2019, Green Transformation: Lessons from the Fuel Cell Innovation System in Taiwan, Journal of Cleaner Production, 240
  13. Duymedjian, 2010, Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory, Organizational Studies, 31, 133, 10.1177/0170840609347051 · DOI
  14. Fisher, 2012, Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1019, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x · DOI
  15. Garud, 2003, Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32, 277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2 · DOI
  16. Garud, 2002, Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java, Academy of Management, 45, 196, 10.2307/3069292 · DOI
  17. Glaeser, 2004, Do institutions cause growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271, 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038933.16398.ed · DOI
  18. Gowdy, 2020, Our hunter-gatherer future: Climate change, agriculture and uncivilization, Futures, 115, 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102488 · DOI
  19. Griffiths, 2005, Institutional governance systems and variations in national competitive advantage: an integrative framework, Academy of Management Review, 30, 823, 10.5465/amr.2005.18378880 · DOI
  20. Hodgson, 2006, What are institutions, Journal of Economic Issues, 40, 1, 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879 · DOI
  21. Hu, 2005, National innovative capacity in East Asia, Research Policy, 34, 1322, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.009 · DOI
  22. Khan, 2020, Consumer green behaviour: An approach towards environmental sustainability, Sustainable Development, 28, 1
  23. Lee, 2000, Management of scrap computer recycling in Taiwan, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 73, 209, 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00191-0 · DOI
  24. Lo, 2020, Acting as an innovation niche seeder: how can the reverse salient of Southeast Asian economies be overcome?, Journal of Evolutionary Economics., 10.1007/s00191-020-00685-5 · DOI
  25. MacDonald, 2012, Understanding participatory action research: a qualitative research methodology option, Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13, 34, 10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Maguire, 2004, Institutional entrepreneurship inemerging fields: HIV/AIDStreatment advocacy in Canada, Academy of Management, 47, 657, 10.2307/20159610 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Marques, 2018, Economic growth, sustainable development and food consumption: Evidence across different income groups of countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 245, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.011 · DOI
  28. Obbard, 2014, Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice, Earth's Future, 2, 315, 10.1002/2014EF000240 · DOI
  29. Powell, 2014, It's what you make of it: Founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity, Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1406, 10.5465/amj.2012.0454 · DOI
  30. Rindova, 2011, A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation, Organization Science, 22, 413, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0537 · DOI
  31. Senyard, 2009, Entrepreneurial bricolage: Towards systematic empirical testing, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29, 5
  32. Senyard, 2014, Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource‐constrained new firms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 211, 10.1111/jpim.12091 · DOI
  33. Wu, 2017, Short-term versus long-term benefits: Balanced sustainability framework and research propositions, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 11, 18, 10.1016/j.spc.2016.09.003 · DOI
  34. Zeschky, 2011, Frugal innovation in emerging markets: The case of Mettler Toledo, Research Technology Management, 54, 38, 10.5437/08956308X5404007 · DOI
  35. Zott, 2007, How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 70, 10.2189/asqu.52.1.70 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, C.-Y., Hu, M.-C., & Ni, F.-C.
Venue
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
26
Pages
228-238
ISSN
2352-5509
DOI
10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009
PMC
PMC7547840
Cited by
101
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
  • Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review