Cited by 29Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Waste-to-energy innovative system: Assessment of integrating anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis technologies

Open access
Caiardi, Fanny, Belaud, Jean-Pierre, Vialle, Claire, Monlau, Florian, Tayibi, Saida, Barakat, Abdellatif, Oukarroum, Abdallah, Zeroual, Youssef +1 more·2022·Sustainable Production and Consumption

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.021

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Huang and Fooladi (2021) found that anaerobic digestion technologies generated 45.2% and 41.9% more electricity than landfill gas technologies in Tehran and Beijing, respectively, over 20 years.

    “They found that the technologies generated 45.2% and 41.9% more electricity than landfill gas technologies in Tehran and Beijing, respectively, and that anaerobic digestion had the most substantial potential to mitigate global warming (Caiardi et al. 2022).”

    From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Caiardi et al. 2022

    The Introduction and climate-change discussion describe electricity generation and greenhouse-gas impacts from anaerobic digestion, but neither reports a Tehran–Beijing comparison with landfill gas. Searches for the 45.2% and 41.9% figures and for Huang and Fooladi found no passage supporting those figures or the claim that anaerobic digestion had the greatest global-warming mitigation potential. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]13. IPCC, 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  2. [36]36. Shibasaki, M., Warburg, N., Eyerer, P., 2006. Upscaling effect and Life Cycle Assessment [WWW Document]. URL https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Upscaling-effect-and-Life-Cycle- Assessment-Shibasaki-Warburg/8e8ae240caeed980f5bc0f5dd2725f4f6e6eb2e9 (accessed 1.13.22).
  3. [37]37. Shibasakia, M., Albrecht, S., Kupfer, T., 2007. Small Scale and Large Scale Plants -Effect on Life Cycle Assessment [WWW Document]. URL https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Small-Scale- and-Large-Scale-Plants-%E2%80%93-Effect-on-Life-Shibasakia- Albrecht/b416277f1d450a755be8e61e9d9a3d4553649836 (accessed 1.13.22).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caiardi, F., Belaud, J.-P., Vialle, C., Monlau, F., Tayibi, S., Barakat, A., Oukarroum, A., Zeroual, Y., & Sablayrolles, C.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Association Pôle Environnement Sud Aquitaine (FR)
  • Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
  • Ingénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes (FR)
  • OCP Group (Morocco) (MA)
Corresponding author
Caiardi, Fanny
Venue
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
31
Pages
657-669
ISSN
2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220870012
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainable Production and Consumption (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique
  • OCP Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, sewage sludge, co-digestion, waste-to-energy, digestate application, life cycle assessment, global warming potential, fossil resource use, eutrophication, acidification, particulate matter, bioenergy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review