Cited by 180Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

Fear-type emotion recognition for future audio-based surveillance systems

Open access
Clavel, C., Vasilescu, I., Devillers, L., Richard, G., Ehrette, T.·2008·Speech Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.specom.2008.03.012

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clavel, C., Vasilescu, I., Devillers, L., Richard, G., & Ehrette, T.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire Mécanique des Solides (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Clavel, C.
Venue
Speech Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
487-503
ISSN
0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158705122
Cited by
180
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech emotion recognition, public safety, threat situations, decision fusion, noisy environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review