The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care have led to improvements in outcomes in numerous surgical areas, through multimodal optimization of patient pathway, reduction of complications, improved patient experience and reduction in the length of stay. ERAS represent a relatively new paradigm in spine surgery. PURPOSE: This multidisciplinary consensus review summarizes the literature and proposes recommendations for the perioperative care of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery with an ERAS program. STUDY DESIGN: This is a review article. METHODS: Under the impetus of the ERAS® society, a multidisciplinary guideline development group was constituted by bringing together international experts involved in the practice of ERAS and spine surgery. This group identified 22 ERAS items for lumbar fusion. A systematic search in the English language was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies were included, and the evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Consensus recommendation was reached by the group after a critical appraisal of the literature. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six articles were included to develop the consensus statements for 22 ERAS items; one ERAS item (prehabilitation) was excluded from the final summary due to very poor quality and conflicting evidence in lumbar spinal fusion. From these remaining 21 ERAS items, 28 recommendations were included. All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on the best available evidence. These included nine preoperative, eleven intraoperative, and six postoperative recommendations. They span topics from preoperative patient education and nutritional evaluation, intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques, and postoperative multimodal analgesic strategies. The level of evidence for the use of each recommendation is presented. CONCLUSION: Based on the best evidence available for each ERAS item within the multidisciplinary perioperative care pathways, the ERAS® Society presents this comprehensive consensus review for perioperative care in lumbar fusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305 · cited 4×
“GRADE system for rating quality of evidence [31]”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBy the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2015) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13702 · Cited by 2,609
Apfel, C. C., Läärä, E., Koivuranta, M., Greim, C.-A., & Roewer, N. (1999) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022 · Cited by 2,121
Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Ip, H. Y. V., Abrishami, A., Peng, P. W. H., Wong, J., & Chung, F. (2009) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181aae87a · Cited by 1,055
Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008
Rajaee, S. S., Bae, H. W., Kanim, L. E. A., & Delamarter, R. B. (2012) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31820cccfb · Cited by 1,041
Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications
Brady, M. C., Kinn, S., Stuart, P., & Ness, V. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004423 · Cited by 694
Sørensen, L. T. (2012) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.5 · Cited by 645
Brindle, M., Nelson, G., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., & Gustafsson, U. O. (2020) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50238 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Cited by
Enhanced recovery after surgery for major orthopedic surgery: a narrative review
Choi, Y. S., Kim, T. W., Chang, M. J., Kang, S.-B., & Chang, C. B. (2022) · Knee Surgery & Related Research · doi:10.1186/s43019-022-00137-3 · Cited by 83
Sultan, P., Monks, D. T., Sharawi, N., Bamber, J., Panelli, D. M., Sauro, K. M., Shah, P. S., Muraca, G. M., Metcalfe, A., Wood, S. L., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.038 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Debono, B., Wainwright, T. W., Wang, M. Y., Sigmundsson, F. G., Yang, M. M. H., Smid-Nanninga, H., Bonnal, A., Le Huec, J.-C., Fawcett, W. J., Ljungqvist, O., Lonjon, G., & de Boer, H. D.
- Venue
- The Spine Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 729-752
- ISSN
- 1529-9430 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3118424014
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 53.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001
- The paper
- Debono, B., Wainwright, T. W., Wang, M. Y., Sigmundsson, F. G., Yang, M. M. H., Smid-Nanninga, H., Bonnal, A., Le Huec, J.-C., Fawcett, W. J., Ljungqvist, O., Lonjon, G., & de Boer, H. D. (2021). Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. The Spine Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.