Cited by 5Library Science and Information LiteracyEducational Methods and Media UseLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influence of information literacy skills on students’ choice of competition type: A study of library visiting day competition

Open access
Antasari, Indah Wijaya·2025·Social Sciences & Humanities Open

Abstract

On September 14, 1995, President Soeharto inaugurated the observance of Library Visiting Day in Indonesia. Accordingly, in 2022, the UIN Saizu library observed this annual event by organizing various competitions such as book review, creative video presentations, reading ambassadors, and library representatives with the IFLA information literacy standards. In this regard, this study is aimed at analyzing the impact of library visiting day competitions on students’ information literacy skills. A quantitative research method was employed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) SmartPLS4 application. The study population comprised 158 students who participated in the library visiting day competition at UIN Saizu library, of which 38 respondents were selected. Furthermore, the analysis was conducted by calculating second orders with an embedded two-stage approach. The first stage was concentrated on measuring the dimensions of the information literacy variable, but in the second, variables were calculated based on their dimensions. The results showed that neither the faculty nor the study level of students significantly affected their literacy ability or choice of competition. However, it was found that students' literacy skills significantly influenced their choice of competition types. This result implies that students with higher literacy levels tend to select competitions with higher levels of difficulty.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101255

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kovalik, 2013, Vol. 16

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Antasari, I. W.
Affiliations
Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto (ID)
Corresponding author
Antasari, Indah Wijaya
Venue
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025
Volume
11
Pages
101255
ISSN
2590-2911 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405628089
Cited by
4
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Sciences & Humanities Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Media Use
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords
information literacy, student competition, university students, library events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review