The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment
Abstract
Abstract Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is one of the most important risk assessment tools which has been extensively used in different industries and organizations. In the conventional FMEA, sometimes the difference between some failure modes cannot be distinguished. In order to evaluate various failure modes more precisely, a novel fuzzy hybrid model for FMEA is proposed in this paper. In this method, fuzzy weighted risk priority number (FWRPN) is considered instead of RPN for each failure. The weights of the three factors and the weights of failure modes are computed by extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MULTIMOORA methods, respectively. The proposed fuzzy MULTIMOORA method calculates the weight of each failure based on three criteria of time, cost, and profit through fuzzy linguistic terms. After calculating FWRPN for each failure, corrective actions are performed for eliminating the identified failures or decreasing the effects of them. Then, corrected fuzzy weighted risk priority number (CFWRPN) is computed for each failure. Finally, the average of FWRPNs (AFWRPNs) with the average of CFWRPNs (ACFWRPNs) are compared to evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions by a novel ranking fuzzy numbers method. In addition, the proposed ranking fuzzy number method is also used in both previously mentioned fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. Eventually, Kerman Steel Industries Factory is considered as a case study to demonstrate the applicability and benefits of the proposed fuzzy hybrid method. A sensitivity analysis is performed to validate the obtained results. Findings show that AFWRPNs decreased by 56% compared to ACFWRPNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
SAATY, T. L., & KEARNS, K. P. (1985) · Analytical Planning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,357
Case study research: Design and methods
McCorcle, M. D., & Bell, E. L. (1986) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(86)90052-2 · Cited by 5,885
A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory
van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(83)80082-7 · Cited by 3,045
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution
Schneider, H. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424 · Cited by 1,493
The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy
Brauers, W. K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006) · Control and Cybernetics · Cited by 968
Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review
Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010 · Cited by 965
Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis
Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-d · Cited by 687
Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2010.01 · Cited by 649
Cited by
An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA
Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2020) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104195 · Cited by 215
Li, Y., Liu, P., & Li, G. (2023) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2023.109196 · Cited by 50
Yan, W., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, X.-M., Jiang, Z.-G., & Huang, L. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51169-6 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M.
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 290-300
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768032368
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 31.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018
- The paper
- Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018). Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.