Cited by 4Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySocial Robot Interaction and HRIAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The effects of automated vehicle reliability, self-estimated confidence, and repeated interactions on drivers’ trust and takeover decisions

Lee, Myeongkyu, Pitts, Brandon J.·2026·Safety Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107062

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Lee, M., & Pitts, B. J.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Myeongkyu
Venue
Safety Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-03
Volume
195
Pages
107062
ISSN
0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416544979
Cited by
4
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Safety Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1836900, 1836952)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
trust in automated vehicles, human-vehicle interaction, takeover decisions, vehicle reliability, repeated interaction, conditionally automated vehicles, obstacle avoidance, driver trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review