The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of nanocrystalline magnetite size on arsenic removal
Open accessAbstract
Higher environmental standards have made the removal of arsenic from water an important problem for environmental engineering. Iron oxide is a particularly interesting sorbent to consider for this application. Its magnetic properties allow relatively routine dispersal and recovery of the adsorbent into and from groundwater or industrial processing facilities; in addition, iron oxide has strong and specific interactions with both As(III) and As(V). Finally, this material can be produced with nanoscale dimensions, which enhance both its capacity and removal. The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential arsenic adsorption by nanoscale iron oxides, specifically magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. We focus on the effect of Fe3O4 particle size on the adsorption and desorption behavior of As(III) and As(V). The results show that the nanoparticle size has a dramatic effect on the adsorption and desorption of arsenic. As particle size is decreased from 300 to 12 nm the adsorption capacities for both As(III) and As(V) increase nearly 200 times. Interestingly, such an increase is more than expected from simple considerations of surface area and suggests that nanoscale iron oxide materials sorb arsenic through different means than bulk systems. The desorption process, however, exhibits some hysteresis with the effect becoming more pronounced with small nanoparticles. This hysteresis most likely results from a higher arsenic affinity for Fe3O4 nanoparticles. This work suggests that Fe3O4 nanocrystals and magnetic separations offer a promising method for arsenic removal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Arsenic — a Review. Part I: Occurrence, Toxicity, Speciation, Mobility
Bissen, M., & Frimmel, F. H. (2003) · Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica · doi:10.1002/aheh.200390025 · Cited by 916
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment
Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J., & Li, Q. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 · Cited by 2,444
New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment
Ali, I. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300133d · Cited by 1,758
A Review of Removal of Pollutants from Water/Wastewater Using Different Types of Nanomaterials
Amin, M. T., Alazba, A. A., & Manzoor, U. (2014) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/825910 · Cited by 645
Nanoadsorbents: Classification, Preparation, and Applications (with Emphasis on Aqueous Media)
Khajeh, M., Laurent, S., & Dastafkan, K. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400086v · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayo, J. T., Yavuz, C., Yean, S., Cong, L., Shiple, H., Yu, W., Falkner, J., Kan, A., Tomson, M., & Colvin, V. L.
- Venue
- Science and Technology of Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 71-75
- ISSN
- 1468-6996 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2048176719
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of nanocrystalline magnetite size on arsenic removal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.stam.2006.10.005
- The paper
- Mayo, J. T., Yavuz, C., Yean, S., Cong, L., Shiple, H., Yu, W., Falkner, J., Kan, A., Tomson, M., & Colvin, V. L. (2007). The effect of nanocrystalline magnetite size on arsenic removal. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2006.10.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.