Cited by 202CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringChromatin Remodeling and CancerTGF-β signaling in diseases

Genome-Scale CRISPR Screening in Human Intestinal Organoids Identifies Drivers of TGF-β Resistance

Open access
Ringel, Till, Frey, Nina, Ringnalda, Femke, Janjuha, Sharan, Cherkaoui, Sarah, Butz, Stefan, Srivatsa, Sumana, Pirkl, Martin +8 more·2020·Cell Stem Cell

Abstract

Forward genetic screens with genome-wide CRISPR libraries are powerful tools for resolving cellular circuits and signaling pathways. Applying this technology to organoids, however, has been hampered by technical limitations. Here we report improved accuracy and robustness for pooled-library CRISPR screens by capturing sgRNA integrations in single organoids, substantially reducing required cell numbers for genome-scale screening. We applied our approach to wild-type and APC mutant human intestinal organoids to identify genes involved in resistance to TGF-β-mediated growth restriction, a key process during colorectal cancer progression, and validated hits including multiple subunits of the tumor-suppressive SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Mutations within these genes require concurrent inactivation of APC to promote TGF-β resistance and attenuate TGF-β target gene transcription. Our approach can be applied to a variety of assays and organoid types to facilitate biological discovery in primary 3D tissue models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2020.02.007

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPR cutting screens in 3D organoids have been implemented to explore factors such as growth factor dependency for cell growth, identify potential cancer-driving forces, and uncover key genetic events in cell differentiation.

    “Even more exciting is the implementation of CRISPR cutting screens in 3D organoids to explore factors such as growth factor dependency for cell growth14–16, identifying potential cancer-driving forces17–19, and uncovering key genetic events in cell differentiation20–22.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Liu, L., Liu, X., Ren, X., Tian, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, X., Du, Y., Jiang, C., Fang, Y., Liu, Z., et al. (2016). Smad2 and Smad3 have differential sensitivity in relaying TGFb signaling and inversely regulate early lineage specification. Sci. Rep. 6, 21602, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21602. · DOI
  2. Takeda, H., Kataoka, S., Nakayama, M., Ali, M.A.E., Oshima, H., Yamamoto, D., Park, J.W., Takegami, Y., An, T., Jenkins, N.A., et al. (2019). CRISPR- Cas9-mediated gene knockout in intestinal tumor organoids provides func- tional validation for colorectal cancer driver genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15635-15644.
  3. Tokheim, C.J., Papadopoulos, N., Kinzler, K.W., Vogelstein, B., and Karchin, R. (2016). Evaluating the evaluation of cancer driver genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14330-14335.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ringel, T., Frey, N., Ringnalda, F., Janjuha, S., Cherkaoui, S., Butz, S., Srivatsa, S., Pirkl, M., Russo, G., Villiger, L., Rogler, G., Clevers, H., Beerenwinkel, N., Zamboni, N., Baubec, T., & Schwank, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
Corresponding author
Schwank, Gerald
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
431-440.e8
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W3009694030
Cited by
202
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 13
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
CRISPR screen, intestinal organoids, TGF-beta resistance, colorectal cancer progression, APC mutation, SWI/SNF complex, growth restriction, forward genetic screen, 3D tissue models
MeSH terms
Genetic Testing, Humans, Intestines, Organoids, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review