Cited by 294Soil Management and Crop YieldSoil Science and Environmental ManagementSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment

Armenise, E., Redmile-Gordon, M.A., Stellacci, A.M., Ciccarese, A., Rubino, P.·2013·Soil and Tillage Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.still.2013.02.013

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The flexible and context-specific approach to soil quality assessment of the SMAF has inspired several recent studies.

    “The fl exible and context-speci fi c approach to soil quality assessment of the SMAF as described above has inspired several recent studies”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Armenise et al., 2013

  • These recent studies apply multivariate statistical methods to select the most relevant indicators.

    “that apply multivariate statistical methods to select the most relevant indicators”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Armenise et al., 2013

  • These recent studies often rely on assumed but not assessed connections between indicators and soil functions.

    “often based on assumed but not assessed connections between indicators and soil functions”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Armenise et al., 2013

  • These recent studies utilize scoring functions to arrive at a soil quality index geared to the specific conditions.

    “and utilize scoring functions to arrive at a soil quality index geared to the speci fi c conditions”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Armenise et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armenise, E., Redmile-Gordon, M. A., Stellacci, A. M., Ciccarese, A., & Rubino, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
  • Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (IT)
Corresponding author
Armenise, E.
Venue
Soil and Tillage Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
130
Pages
91-98
ISSN
0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964375459
Cited by
294
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Soil and Tillage Research (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/C/00005189, BB/J021628/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
soil quality index, soil quality assessment, crop rotation, wheat, dry beans, stubble management, residue burning, stubble incorporation, NPK fertilization, soil pH, available phosphorus, labile nitrogen, exchangeable cations, soil physical properties, soil chemical properties, crop yield, Mediterranean agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review