Biomass yield, yield stability and soil carbon and nitrogen content under cropping systems destined for biorefineries
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable agriculture should aim to increase biomass yield and yield stability, while protecting soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content. However, few studies have concurrently explored changes in biomass yield, yield stability and soil C and N content under different cropping systems targeting biorefinery. In this study, 10 different cropping systems were simultaneously investigated from 2012 to 2017 in central Denmark on a loamy sand soil, including (1) two continuous monocultures of annual crops, (2) one optimized crop rotation, (3) five intensively fertilized perennial grasses, and (4) two grass-legume mixtures without nitrogen (N) fertilization. Our results showed that biomass yield and yield stability differed highly across the cropping systems, highlighting crop-specific characteristics. Of the 10 cropping systems, tall fescue significantly increased soil C and N content at 0–20 cm depth, while sustaining high biomass yield and yield stability. There was no clear relationship between biomass yield, yield stability and changes in soil C and N content, challenging some recent findings on the conflicts between increasing biomass yield and protecting soil C and N content. Indeed, the lack of relationships suggest that there is considerable potential to increase biomass yield and yield stability without compromising soil C and N content through selecting proper cropping systems and managements. Altogether, our results underscore how crop-specific documentation of biomass yield, yield stability and changes in soil C and N content on the same experimental platform can advance the understanding of sustainable agriculture for biorefineries, although long-term continuous observations are still required to better clarify the relations between them.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Arable land conversion to perennial energy crops has been shown to increase soil C stocks on both regional and global scales.
“Arable land conversion to perennial energy crops has been shown to increase soil C stocks on both regional and global scales (Chen, Lærke, & Jørgensen,2022; Chen, Manevski, et al., 2022; Ledo et al., 2020).”
From Marginal land conversion to perennial energy crops with biomass removal enhances soil carbon sequestration (2022) · cites this paper as Chen, Manevski, et al., 2022
Section 3.2 reports that perennial grasses increased soil C content while annual crops decreased it in some soil layers, supporting the direction of the claim. The study measured soil C content in cropping systems established in Denmark; it does not establish increased soil C stocks on regional or global scales. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · see citing works
McDaniel, M. D., Tiemann, L. K., & Grandy, A. S. (2014) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/13-0616.1 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005
Rudel, T. K., Schneider, L., Uriarte, M., Turner, B. L., DeFries, R., Lawrence, D., Geoghegan, J., Hecht, S., Ickowitz, A., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812540106 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Perdomo, J. A., Capó-Bauçà, S., Carmo-Silva, E., & Galmés, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00490 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming
Balmford, A., Amano, T., Bartlett, H., Chadwick, D., Collins, A., Edwards, D., Field, R., Garnsworthy, P., Green, R., Smith, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0138-5 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Larsen, S. U., Jørgensen, U., Kjeldsen, J. B., & Lærke, P. E. (2014) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-013-9389-1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- Adkins, J., Jastrow, J.D., Morris, G.P., de Graaff, M.-A., 2019. Effects of fertilization, plant species, and intra-specific diversity on soil carbon and nitrogen in biofuel cropping systems after five growing seasons. Biomass Bioenergy 130, 105393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105393. · DOI
- Albers, A., Avadí, A., Benoist, A., Collet, P., Hélias, A., 2020. Modelling dynamic soil organic carbon flows of annual and perennial energy crops to inform energy- transport policy scenarios in France. Sci. Total Environ. 718, 135278 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135278. · DOI
- Becker, H.C., Leon, J., 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x. · DOI
- Bélanger, G., Gastal, F., Lemaire, G., 1992. Growth analysis of a tall fescue sward fertilized with different rates of nitrogen. Crop Sci. 32, 1371-1376. https://doi.org/ 10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183×003200060013x. · DOI
- Bren d ′ Amour, C., Reitsma, F., Baiocchi, G., Barthel, S., Güneralp, B., Erb, K.-H., et al., 2017. Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 8939-8944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114. · DOI
- Butterly, C.R., Armstrong, R.D., Chen, D., Tang, C., 2019. Residue decomposition and soil carbon priming in three contrasting soils previously exposed to elevated CO 2 . Biol. Fertil. Soils 55, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-018-1321-6. · DOI
- Carlsson, G., Mårtensson, L.M., Prade, T., Svensson, S.E., Jensen, E.S., 2017. Perennial species mixtures for multifunctional production of biomass on marginal land. GCB Bioenergy 9, 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12373. · DOI
- Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G., 2010. Carbon and nitrogen storage by deep-rooted tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) in the surface and subsurface soil of a fine sandy loam in eastern Canada. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 136, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agee.2009.12.005. · DOI
- Chen, J., Luo, Y., van Groenigen, K.J., Hungate, B.A., Cao, J., Zhou, X., 2018. A keystone microbial enzyme for nitrogen control of soil carbon storage. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1689. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1689. · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, J., Elsgaard, L., van Groenigen, K.J., Olesen, J.E., Liang, Z., Jiang, Y., et al., 2020a. Soil carbon loss with warming: New evidence from carbon-degrading enzymes. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1944-1952. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14986. · DOI
- Chen, J., Lærke, P.E., Jørgensen, U., 2020b. Optimized crop rotations increase biomass production without significantly changing soil carbon and nitrogen stock. Ecol. Indic. 117, 106669 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106669. · DOI
- Chen, Ji, Lærke, P.E., Jørgensen, U., 2022. Land conversion from annual to perennial crops: A win-win strategy for biomass yield and soil organic carbon and total nitrogen sequestration. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 330, 107907 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107907. · DOI · Paper page
- Chimonyo, V.G.P., Snapp, S.S., Chikowo, R., 2019. Grain legumes increase yield stability in Maize based cropping systems. Crop Sci. 59, 1222-1235. https://doi.org/ 10.2135/cropsci2018.09.0532. · DOI
- Congreves, K.A., Hooker, D.C., Hayes, A., Verhallen, E.A., Van Eerd, L.L., 2017. Interaction of long-term nitrogen fertilizer application, crop rotation, and tillage system on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Plant Soil 410, 113-127. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11104-016-2986-y. · DOI
- Cowie, A.L., Smith, P., Johnson, D., 2006. Does soil carbon loss in biomass production systems negate the greenhouse benefits of bioenergy? Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 11, 979-1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9030-0. · DOI
- Culman, S.W., DuPont, S.T., Glover, J.D., Buckley, D.H., Fick, G.W., Ferris, H., et al., 2010. Long-term impacts of high-input annual cropping and unfertilized perennial grass production on soil properties and belowground food webs in Kansas, USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 137, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.008. · DOI
- Cusser, S., Bahlai, C., Swinton, S.M., Robertson, G.P., Haddad, N.M., 2020. Long-term research avoids spurious and misleading trends in sustainability attributes of no-till. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3715-3725. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15080. · DOI
- Dias, T., Dukes, A., Antunes, P.M., 2015. Accounting for soil biotic effects on soil health and crop productivity in the design of crop rotations. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95, 447-454. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6565. · DOI
- Drewer, J., Finch, J.W., Lloyd, C.R., Baggs, E.M., Skiba, U., 2012. How do soil emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO 2 from perennial bioenergy crops differ from arable annual crops? GCB Bioenergy 4, 408-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757- 1707.2011.01136.x. · DOI · Paper page
- Franzluebbers, A.J., Nazih, N., Stuedemann, J.A., Fuhrmann, J.J., Schomberg, H.H., Hartel, P.G., 1999. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools under low-and high-endophyte- infected Tall Fescue 1 trade and company names are included for the benefit of the reader and do not imply any endorsement or preferential treatment of the product listed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1687-1694. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361687x. · DOI
- Fritz, S., See, L., McCallum, I., You, L., Bun, A., Moltchanova, E., et al., 2015. Mapping global cropland and field size. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1980-1992. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gcb.12838. · DOI
- Gaudin, A.C.M., Tolhurst, T.N., Ker, A.P., Janovicek, K., Tortora, C., Martin, R.C., et al., 2015. Increasing crop diversity mitigates weather variations and improves yield stability. Plos One 10, e0113261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113261. · DOI
- Godfray, H.C.J., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., et al., 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812-818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383. · DOI · Paper page
- Grover, K.K., Karsten, H.D., Roth, G.W., 2009. Corn grain yields and yield stability in four long-term cropping systems. Agron. J. 101, 940-946. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronj2008.0221x. · DOI
- Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Lachouani, P., Knudsen, M.T., Ambus, P., Boelt, B., Gislum, R., 2016. Productivity and carbon footprint of perennial grass-forage legume intercropping strategies with high or low nitrogen fertilizer input. Sci. Total Environ. 541, 1339-1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.013. · DOI
- Huang, B., Gao, H., 2000. Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in Tall Fescue cultivars. Crop Sci. 40, 196-203. https://doi.org/10.2135/ cropsci2000.401196x. · DOI
- Ingvordsen, C.H., Backes, G., Lyngkjær, M.F., Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jensen, J.D., Jalli, M., et al., 2015. Significant decrease in yield under future climate conditions: Stability and production of 138 spring barley accessions. Eur. J. Agron. 63, 105-113. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.12.003. · DOI
- Jenkins, M.B., Franzluebbers, A.J., Humayoun, S.B., 2006. Assessing short-term responses of prokaryotic communities in bulk and rhizosphere soils to tall fescue endophyte infection. Plant Soil 289, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006- 9141-0. · DOI
- Jian, S., Li, J., Chen, J., Wang, G., Mayes, M.A., Dzantor, K.E., et al., 2016. Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: A meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 101, 32-43. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.003. · DOI
- Jiang, Y., Carrijo, D., Huang, S., Chen, J., Balaine, N., Zhang, W., et al., 2019. Water management to mitigate the global warming potential of rice systems: A global meta- analysis. Field Crops Res. 234, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.010. · DOI
- Jungers, J.M., Eckberg, J.O., Betts, K., Mangan, M.E., Wyse, D.L., Sheaffer, C.C., 2017. Plant roots and GHG mitigation in native perennial bioenergy cropping systems. GCB Bioenergy 9, 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12321. · DOI
- Kim, K., Daly, E.J., Hernandez-Ramirez, G., 2021. Perennial grain cropping enhances the soil methane sink in temperate agroecosystems. Geoderma 388, 114931. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.114931. · DOI
- King, A.E., Blesh, J., 2018. Crop rotations for increased soil carbon: perenniality as a guiding principle. Ecol. Appl. 28, 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1648. · DOI
- Knapp, S., van der Heijden, M.G.A., 2018. A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture. Nat. Commun. 9, 3632. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-018-05956-1. · DOI
- Körschens, M., Albert, E., Armbruster, M., Barkusky, D., Baumecker, M., Behle-Schalk, L., et al., 2013. Effect of mineral and organic fertilization on crop yield, nitrogen uptake, carbon and nitrogen balances, as well as soil organic carbon content and dynamics: Results from 20 European long-term field experiments of the twenty-first century. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59, 1017-1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03650340.2012.704548. · DOI
- Kuebbing, S.E., Reimer, A.P., Rosenthal, S.A., Feinberg, G., Leiserowitz, A., Lau, J.A., et al., 2018. Long-term research in ecology and evolution: a survey of challenges and opportunities. Ecol. Monogr. 88, 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1289. · DOI
- Leip, A., Weiss, F., Lesschen, J.P., Westhoek, H., 2014. The nitrogen footprint of food products in the European Union. J. Agric. Sci. 152, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0021859613000786. · DOI
- Li, J., Ye, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Yu, N., Zou, H., 2021a. Maize straw deep-burying promotes soil bacteria community abundance and improves soil fertility. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00448-6. · DOI
- Li, Y., Chen, J., Feng, H., Dong, Q. g, Siddique, K.H.M., 2021b. Responses of canopy characteristics and water use efficiency to ammoniated straw incorporation for summer maize (Zea mays L.) in the Loess Plateau, China. Agric. Water Manag. 254, 106948 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106948. · DOI
- Li, Y., Feng, H., Chen, J., Lu, J., Wu, W., Liu, X., et al., 2022. Biochar incorporation increases winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production with significantly improving soil enzyme activities at jointing stage. CATENA 211, 105979. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105979. · DOI
- Macholdt, J., Piepho, H.-P., Honermeier, B., 2019. Mineral NPK and manure fertilisation affecting the yield stability of winter wheat: Results from a long-term field experiment. Eur. J. Agron. 102, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.10.007. · DOI
- Manevski, K., Lærke, P.E., Jiao, X., Santhome, S., Jørgensen, U., 2017. Biomass productivity and radiation utilisation of innovative cropping systems for biorefinery. Agric. For. Meteorol. 233, 250-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agrformet.2016.11.245. · DOI
- Manevski, K., Lærke, P.E., Olesen, J.E., Jørgensen, U., 2018. Nitrogen balances of innovative cropping systems for feedstock production to future biorefineries. Sci. Total Environ. 633, 372-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.155. · DOI
- Mariotte, P., Mehrabi, Z., Bezemer, T.M., De Deyn, G.B., Kulmatiski, A., Drigo, B., et al., 2018. Plant-soil feedback: bridging natural and agricultural sciences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.005. · DOI
- McGowan, A.R., Nicoloso, R.S., Diop, H.E., Roozeboom, K.L., Rice, C.W., 2019. Soil organic carbon, aggregation, and microbial community structure in annual and perennial biofuel crops. Agron. J. 111, 128-142. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronj2018.04.0284. · DOI
- Morandi, F., Perrin, A., Østergård, H., 2016. Miscanthus as energy crop: Environmental assessment of a miscanthus biomass production case study in France. J. Clean. Prod. 137, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.042. · DOI · Paper page
- Nouri, A., Lee, J., Yin, X., Saxton, A.M., Tyler, D.D., Sykes, V.R., et al., 2019. Crop species in no-tillage summer crop rotations affect soil quality and yield in an Alfisol. Geoderma 345, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.026. · DOI
- Pérez, P., Morcuende, R., Martín del Molino, I., Sánchez de la Puente, L., Martínez- Carrasco, R., 2001. Contrasting responses of photosynthesis and carbon metabolism to low temperatures in tall fescue and clovers. Physiol. Plant. 112, 478-486. https:// doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120404.x. · DOI
- Plaza-Bonilla, D., Álvaro-Fuentes, J., Hansen, N.C., Lampurlanés, J., Cantero- Martínez, C., 2014. Winter cereal root growth and aboveground-belowground biomass ratios as affected by site and tillage system in dryland Mediterranean conditions. Plant Soil 374, 925-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1926-3. · DOI
- Raseduzzaman, M., Jensen, E.S., 2017. Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Agron. 91, 25-33. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eja.2017.09.009. · DOI
- Ray, D.K., Gerber, J.S., MacDonald, G.K., West, P.C., 2015. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nat. Commun. 6, 5989. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms6989. · DOI · Paper page
- Sanaullah, M., Chabbi, A., Lemaire, G., Charrier, X., Rumpel, C., 2010. How does plant leaf senescence of grassland species influence decomposition kinetics and litter compounds dynamics? Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 88, 159-171. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10705-009-9323-2. · DOI
- Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Nita, V., 2015. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environ. Dev. 15, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006. · DOI · Paper page
- Schrama, M., De Haan, J.J., Kroonen, M., Verstegen, H., Van der Putten, W.H., 2018. Crop yield gap and stability in organic and conventional farming systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 256, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.12.023. · DOI
- Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., 2017. Many shades of gray-The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602638 https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.1602638. · DOI · Paper page
- Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., Foley, J.A., 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature11069. · DOI
- Smith, R.G., Menalled, F.D., Robertson, G.P., 2007. Temporal yield variability under conventional and alternative management systems. Agron. J. 99, 1629-1634. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0096. · DOI
- Solati, Z., Jørgensen, U., Eriksen, J., Søegaard, K., 2018. Estimation of extractable protein in botanical fractions of legume and grass species. Grass Forage Sci. 73, 572-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12325. · DOI
- Steinbeiss, S., BeßLer, H., Engels, C., Temperton, V.M., Buchmann, N., Roscher, C., et al., 2008. Plant diversity positively affects short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 2937-2949. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01697.x. · DOI · Paper page
- Stewart, C.E., Follett, R.F., Pruessner, E.G., Varvel, G.E., Vogel, K.P., Mitchell, R.B., 2015. Nitrogen and harvest effects on soil properties under rainfed switchgrass and no-till corn over 9 years: implications for soil quality. GCB Bioenergy 7, 288-301. https:// doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12142. · DOI · Paper page
- Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Olesen, J.E., Kristensen, K., Elsgaard, L., Østergaard, H.S., Lægdsmand, M., et al., 2014. Changes in carbon stocks of Danish agricultural mineral soils between 1986 and 2009. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65, 730-740. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ejss.12169. · DOI
- Thierfelder, C., Chivenge, P., Mupangwa, W., Rosenstock, T.S., Lamanna, C., Eyre, J.X., 2017. How climate-smart is conservation agriculture (CA)? -Its potential to deliver on adaptation, mitigation and productivity on smallholder farms in southern Africa. Food Secur. 9, 537-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0665-3. · DOI
- Thorup-Kristensen, K., Halberg, N., Nicolaisen, M., Olesen, J.E., Crews, T.E., Hinsinger, P., et al., 2020. Digging deeper for agricultural resources, the value of deep rooting. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tplants.2019.12.007. · DOI
- Tiessen, H., Cuevas, E., Chacon, P., 1994. The role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nature 371, 783. https://doi.org/10.1038/371783a0. · DOI
- Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., Befort, B.L., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 20260-20264. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108. · DOI · Paper page
- Valdez, Z.P., Hockaday, W.C., Masiello, C.A., Gallagher, M.E., Philip Robertson, G., 2017. Soil carbon and nitrogen responses to nitrogen fertilizer and harvesting rates in switchgrass cropping systems. BioEnergy Res. 10, 456-464. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12155-016-9810-7. · DOI
- van der Heijden, M.G.A., Hartmann, M., 2016. Networking in the plant microbiome. Plos Biol. 14, e1002378 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002378. · DOI
- Varvel, G.E., 2000. Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on normalized grain yields in a long-term study. Agron. J. 92, 938-941. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronj2000.925938x. · DOI
- Wang, H., Shen, M., Hui, D., Chen, J., Sun, G., Wang, X., et al., 2019. Straw incorporation influences soil organic carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emission, and crop yields in a Chinese rice (Oryza sativa L.) -wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system. Soil Tillage Res. 195, 104377 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104377. · DOI
- Wang, S., Yan, X., Wang, D., Siddique, I.A., Chen, J., Xu, Q., et al., 2021. Soil microbial community based on PLFA profiles in an age sequence of pomegranate plantation in the middle Yellow River floodplain. Diversity 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ d13090408. · DOI
- Wang, X., Feng, Y., Yu, L., Shu, Y., Tan, F., Gou, Y., et al., 2020. Sugarcane/soybean intercropping with reduced nitrogen input improves crop productivity and reduces carbon footprint in China. Sci. Total Environ. 719, 137517 https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2020.137517. · DOI
- Wendling, M., Charles, R., Herrera, J., Amossé, C., Jeangros, B., Walter, A., et al., 2019. Effect of species identity and diversity on biomass production and its stability in cover crop mixtures. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 281, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agee.2019.04.032. · DOI
- White, E.R., 2018. Minimum time required to detect population trends: The need for long-term monitoring programs. BioScience 69, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ biosci/biy144. · DOI
- Yagüe, M.R., Domingo-Olivé, F., Bosch-Serra, À.D., Poch, R.M., Boixadera, J., 2016. Dairy cattle manure effects on soil quality: Porosity, earthworms, aggregates and soil organic carbon fractions. Land Degrad. Dev. 27, 1753-1762. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ldr.2477. · DOI
- Yang, Y., Tilman, D., Lehman, C., Trost, J.J., 2018. Sustainable intensification of high- diversity biomass production for optimal biofuel benefits. Nat. Sustain. 1, 686-692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0166-1. · DOI
- Zhao, J., Yang, X., Liu, Z., Pullens, J.W.M., Chen, J., Marek, G.W., et al., 2020. Greater maize yield improvements in low/unstable yield zones through recommended nutrient and water inputs in the main cropping regions, China. Agric. Water Manag. 232, 106018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106018. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xu, Y., Zhou, J., Feng, W., Jia, R., Liu, C., Fu, T., Xue, S., Yi, Z., Guillaume, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12990 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, J., Manevski, K., Lærke, P. E., & Jørgensen, U.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Ji
- Venue
- Soil and Tillage Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 221
- Pages
- 105397
- ISSN
- 0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223892096
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Soil and Tillage Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Aarhus Universitet
- Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond (AUFF-E-2019-7-1, 839806)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020-MSCA)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Keywords
- biomass yield, yield stability, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, cropping systems, biorefinery feedstock, perennial grasses, tall fescue, grass-legume mixtures, crop rotation, continuous monoculture, nitrogen fertilization, sustainable agriculture, loamy sand soil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review