Cited by 81Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchProtein Structure and Dynamics

Restricted Motion of the Conserved Immunoglobulin G1 N-Glycan Is Essential for Efficient FcγRIIIa Binding

Open access
Subedi, Ganesh P., Hanson, Quinlin M., Barb, Adam W.·2014·Structure

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1)-based therapies are widespread, and many function through interactions with low-affinity Fc γ receptors (FcγR). N-glycosylation of the IgG1 Fc domain is required for FcγR binding, though it is unclear why. Structures of the FcγR:Fc complex fail to explain this because the FcγR polypeptide does not bind the N-glycan. Here we identify a link between motion of the N-glycan and Fc:FcγRIIIa affinity that explains the N-glycan requirement. Fc F241 and F243 mutations decreased the N-glycan/polypeptide interaction and increased N-glycan mobility. The affinity of the Fc mutants for FcγRIIIa was directly proportional to the degree of glycan restriction (R(2) = 0.82). The IgG1 Fc K246F mutation stabilized the N-glycan and enhanced affinity for FcγRIIIa. Allosteric modulation of a protein/protein interaction represents a previously undescribed role for N-glycans in biology. Conserved features suggesting a similar N-glycan/aromatic interaction were also found in IgD, IgE, and IgM, but not IgA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2014.08.002

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barb AW Prestegard JH 2011 NMR analysis demonstrates immunoglobulin G N-glycans are accessible and dynamic Nat Chem Biol 7 147 153 21258329 PMC3074608

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subedi, G. P., Hanson, Q. M., & Barb, A. W.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Barb, Adam W.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1478-1488
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010670539
Cited by
81
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
N-glycosylation, FcγRIIIa, glycan-protein interactions, allosteric modulation, protein-protein interaction, antibody isotypes
MeSH terms
Acetylglucosamine, Humans, Immunoglobulin D, Immunoglobulin E, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Polysaccharides, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Receptors, IgG, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review