Cited by 68Educational Assessment and ImprovementEvaluation and Performance AssessmentEducation and Public Policy

Factors influencing the utilisation of a school self-evaluation instrument

Schildkamp, Kim, Visscher, Adrie·2009·Studies in Educational Evaluation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.12.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementing an action plan based on data is not an easy task for teachers and school leaders.

    “Implementing an action plan based on data is not an easy task for teachers and school leaders (Schildkamp and Visscher 2009; Van Petegem and Vanhoof 2004)”

    From Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps (2019) · cites this paper as Schildkamp and Visscher 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Schildkamp, Kim
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
150-159
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034951257
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
Keywords
school self-evaluation, self-assessment tool, school improvement, success factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review