Cited by 74Educational Assessment and ImprovementStudent Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching Practices

Data-based decision making for instructional improvement in primary education

Open access
Gelderblom, Gert, Schildkamp, Kim, Pieters, Jules, Ehren, Melanie·2016·International Journal of Educational Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.004

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The outcomes of the sense-making process can lead to different types of improvement actions, including curriculum changes, changes in instruction, and changes to assessment practices such as more formative assessments.

    “The outcomes of the sense-making process described above can lead to di ff erent types of improvement actions (see Figure 1). For example, it may lead to curriculum changes and to changes in instruction. It may also lead to changes to the assessment practices in a school, such as the implementation of more formative assessments instead of overreliance on summative assessment”

    From Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps (2019) · cites this paper as Gelderblom et al. 2016

    Section 2.2 describes how interpreting data can generate knowledge that leads teachers to adapt instruction; Section 6.1 also mentions revisiting aspects of the curriculum. The paper does not describe changing a school's assessment practices or replacing reliance on summative assessment with more formative assessments. Its discussion of using assessment data as feedback does not establish that proposed change. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Teachers use data to inform lesson plans, set lesson objectives, develop differentiated instructions, and provide feedback to students.

    “With respect to teaching enhancement purposes, teachers use data to inform their lesson plans (Ford, 2018; Gelderblom et al., 2016; Snodgrass Rangel et al., 2016; Reeves et al., 2016), set lesson objectives (Kallemeyn, 2014; Snodgrass Rangel et al., 2016; Reeves et al., 2016), develop differentiated instructions (Beck et al., 2020; Datnow et al., 2012; Farley-Ripple et al., 2019), and provide”
  • Teachers use data to recognize individual students' learning needs, guide students to learning new or challenging concepts, set learning goals, and monitor learning progress.

    “In relation to supporting student learning, teachers use data to recognize individual students’ learning needs (Curry et al., 2016; Gelderblom et al., 2016), guide students to learning new or challenging concepts (Abrams et al., 2021; Keuning et al., 2017; Marsh et al., 2010; Reeves et al., 2016), set learning goals (Abdusyakur & Poortman, 2019; Curry et al., 2016), and monitor learning progress (”
  • The availability of data does not ensure the actual use of data to make changes in instructional practices in the classroom.

    “Studies (e.g. Gelderblom et al. 2016; Wayman, Jimerson, and Cho 2012) have shown that the availability of data does not ensure the actual use of data to make changes in the instructional practices that happen in the classroom.”

    From Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps (2019) · cites this paper as Gelderblom et al. 2016

  • Teachers may need thorough knowledge of educational government policies to ensure alignment between state-level curriculum initiatives and school-level assessment policies.

    “Teachers may need to have thorough knowledge of educational government policies to ensure alignment between state-level curriculum initiatives and school-level assessment policies (Anderson et al., 2010; Copp, 2017; Gelderblom et al., 2016; Hardy, 2015).”

    From Dimensions of teachers’ data literacy: A systematic review of literature from 1990 to 2021 (2024) · cites this paper as Gelderblom et al., 2016

    Section 3.1 describes Dutch national objectives and government-mandated assessments, while section 6.1 discusses alignment across grade levels through data use. Neither passage says teachers need thorough knowledge of government policies to align state-level curriculum initiatives with school-level assessment policies; searches for that policy-knowledge link found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Creemers, B. P. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2003). De school als organisatie. [The school as an organization]. In N. Verloop, & J. Lowyck (Eds.), Onderwijskunde. Een kennisbasis voor professionals. [Educational theory: a knowledge base for professionals] (pp. 112-149).Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
  2. Nelson, T. H., Slavit, D., & Deuel, A. (2014). Two dimensions of an inquiry stance: A theoretical model for understanding and supporting teachers' collaborative work. Teachers College Record, 114(8), 1-42.
  3. Scheerens, J. (2007). Review and meta-analysis of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gelderblom, G., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Ehren, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gelderblom, Gert
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
80
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514747267
Cited by
74
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
data-driven decision making, teaching improvement, primary school teachers, teacher data use, adaptive instruction, feedback, learning time, learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review