Cited by 52Health Policy Implementation ScienceSchool Health and Nursing EducationObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

CAFÉ: a multicomponent audit and feedback intervention to improve implementation of healthy food policy in primary school canteens: A randomised controlled trial

Open access
Yoong, Sze Lin, Nathan, Nicole, Wolfenden, Luke, Wiggers, John, Reilly, Kathryn, Oldmeadow, Christopher, Wyse, Rebecca, Sutherland, Rachel +5 more·2016·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The implementation of nutrition policies in schools has been recommended as a strategy to improve child dietary intake. Internationally, research suggests that the majority of schools do not implement these policies. In New South Wales (NSW), Australia, the NSW Healthy School Canteen Policy requires that school canteens prohibit the sale of 'red' foods (i.e. foods that are typically nutrient poor and high in energy, such as confectionary and deep-fried foods) and 'banned'drinks (i.e. soft drinks); and that the majority of items on the menu are 'green' (i.e. foods that are good sources of nutrients, such fruits, vegetables and lean meats). This study examined the impact of a multicomponent audit and feedback intervention on schools' implementation of the NSW Healthy School Canteen Policy. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of the intervention on menu composition. METHODS: This study was a parallel group randomised controlled trial with 72 rural and remote primary schools (36 interventions, 36 controls) located in one region within NSW, Australia. Intervention schools received an initial face to face contact and up to four cycles of audit and feedback (consisting of a menu audit, written feedback report and telephone feedback) over a 12-month period. The primary trial outcomes were the proportion of schools with a canteen menu that had: i) no 'red' foods or 'banned' drinks; and ii) >50% 'green' items, as assessed via standardised menu audits undertaken by trained dietitians. For each primary outcome, between-group differences were assessed using Fisher's exact test under an intention to treat approach. RESULTS: There was insufficient evidence to conclude the intervention had a positive impact on the proportion of intervention schools with no 'red' or 'banned' items on their menu (RR = 2.8; 95% CI: 0.9 to 8.9; p = 0.0895), or on the proportion of intervention schools with more than 50% 'green' items (RR = 1.5; 95% CI: 0.7 to 3.2; p = 0.2568). These findings remained non-significant in the multiple imputation analyses. Intervention schools were significantly more likely to have a lower percentage of 'red' items (p-value: 0.007) and a higher percentage of 'green' items on the menu (p-value: 0.014). This remained statistically significant in the multiple imputation analyses for 'red items' (p-value: 0.0081) but not for 'green' items (p-value: 0.0910). CONCLUSIONS: While there was insufficient statistical evidence to suggest that this multicomponent audit and feedback intervention was effective in improving primary schools' compliance with a healthy canteen policy, the intervention demonstrated some positive impact in reducing the availability of 'red' items on the menu. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12613000543785 ). Registered 15th May 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-016-0453-z

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoong, S. L., Nathan, N., Wolfenden, L., Wiggers, J., Reilly, K., Oldmeadow, C., Wyse, R., Sutherland, R., Delaney, T., Butler, P., Janssen, L., Preece, S., & Williams, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
Corresponding author
Yoong, Sze Lin
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2016-12
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
126-126
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560500130
Cited by
52
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Hunter New England Population Health
  • Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
policy implementation, elementary school, menu composition, soft drinks, children's food consumption, rural and remote schools, multicomponent intervention, school nutrition policy, childhood obesity prevention
MeSH terms
Child, Commerce, Diet, Feedback, Female, Food Services, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, New South Wales, Schools, Single-Blind Method, Nutrition Policy, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review