The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acute Management of Traumatic Brain Injury
Open accessAbstract
Synopsis Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in trauma patients. As the primary injury cannot be undone, management strategies must therefore focus on preventing secondary injury by avoiding hypotension and hypoxia and maintaining appropriate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which is a surrogate for cerebral blood flow (CBF). Cerebral perfusion pressure can be maintained by increasing mean arterial pressure (MAP), decreasing intracranial pressure (ICP), or both. MAP can be increased through a combination of pressors in the euvolemic state, although the ideal fluid in TBI patients is unknown. The goal should be euvolemia and avoidance of hypotension. Elevated intracranial pressure can be treated through an algorithmic approach utilization simple bedside maneuvers, hyperosmolar therapy, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) drainage as well as pentobarbital coma and decompressive craniectomy in refractory cases. Mass lesions may require operative evacuation depending on size, exam findings, and ICP measurements. Although CPP may not be an ideal surrogate for cerebral blood flow and metabolic delivery, other modalities have not gained widespread use due to paucity of strong data. Other factors that deserve important consideration in the acute management of TBI patients are venous thromboembolism, stress ulcer, and seizure prophylaxis as well as nutritional and metabolic optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal
Pollack, C. V., Reilly, P. A., Eikelboom, J., Glund, S., Verhamme, P., Bernstein, R. A., Dubiel, R., Huisman, M. V., Hylek, E. M., Kamphuisen, P. W., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1502000 · Cited by 1,552
A Clinical Trial of Progesterone for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Skolnick, B. E., Maas, A. I., Narayan, R. K., van der Hoop, R. G., MacAllister, T., Ward, J. D., Nelson, N. R., & Stocchetti, N. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411090 · Cited by 505
Acosta-Escribano, J., Fernández-Vivas, M., Grau Carmona, T., Caturla-Such, J., Garcia-Martinez, M., Menendez-Mainer, A., Solera-Suarez, M., & Sanchez-Payá, J. (2010) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-010-1908-3 · Cited by 133 · cited 15×
“There is some evidence that transpyloric feeding is associated with a decreased incidence of pneumonia and is more efficacious than the gastric route in patients with TBI.(88) Achieving”
BackgroundInfluentialBouzat, P., Sala, N., Payen, J.-F., & Oddo, M. (2013) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/2110-5820-3-23 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Spermidine Exhibits Protective Effects Against Traumatic Brain Injury
Huang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Yu, H., Lin, Z., & Cai, Y. (2020) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s10571-019-00783-4 · Cited by 23
Recent Developments in Mouse Trauma Research Models: A Mini-Review
Gihring, A., Gärtner, F., Schirmer, M., Wabitsch, M., & Knippschild, U. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.866617 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Vella, M. A., Crandall, M. L., & Patel, M. B.
- Venue
- Surgical Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1015-1030
- ISSN
- 0039-6109 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2756815751
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Management of Traumatic Brain Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.003
- The paper
- Vella, M. A., Crandall, M. L., & Patel, M. B. (2017). Acute Management of Traumatic Brain Injury. Surgical Clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2017.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.