CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 165Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uptake of anionic and cationic dyes from water using natural clay and clay/starch/MnFe2O4 magnetic nanocomposite

Open access
Esvandi, Zahra, Foroutan, Rauf, Peighambardoust, Seyed Jamaleddin, Akbari, Ali, Ramavandi, Bahman·2020·Surfaces and Interfaces
DOI 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100754
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100754

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When pH < pHpzc, the adsorbent surface is positively charged and tends to adsorb anionic species (CR); when pH > pHpzc, cationic species (MB) tends to adsorb on the negatively charged adsorbent surface due to electrostatic interactions.

    “This indicated that when pH<pHpzc, the adsorbent surface is positively charged and tends to absorb anionic species or negatively charged dye, which in this case is CR, while cationic species (MB) tends to absorb on the surface of negatively charged adsorbents (pH>pHpzc) due to electrostatic interactions31.”

    From The removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using biomass-based activated carbon (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

  • The adsorption process of both dyes was desirable and physical.

    “The values of E for the PACs adsorption process were 1.65 kJ/mol (RSS) and 2.34 kJ/mol (RS) for CR dye and 1.84 kJ/mol (RSS) and 2.67 kJ/mol (RS) for MB, demonstrating that the adsorption process of both dyes was desirable and physical31.”

    From The removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using biomass-based activated carbon (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Esvandi, Z., Foroutan, R., Peighambardoust, S. J., Akbari, A., & Ramavandi, B.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Bushehr Branch (IR)
  • University of Tabriz (IR)
  • Jundi-Shapur University of Technology (IR)
  • Bushehr University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Ramavandi, Bahman
ORCID
Venue
Surfaces and Interfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
21
Pages
100754
ISSN
2468-0230 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100754
OpenAlex
W3092895547
Cited by
165
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Surfaces and Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Repository (Bushehr University of Medical Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
dye adsorption, sunset yellow, Nile blue, magnetic nanocomposites, MnFe2O4 nanoparticles, starch, textile wastewater treatment, anionic dyes, cationic dyes, adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, adsorption free energy, water treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review