Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: The RICH Study

Itani, Kamal M.F., Rosen, Michael, Vargo, Daniel, Awad, Samir S., DeNoto, George, Butler, Charles E.·2012·Surgery
DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2012.04.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2012.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Jin, 2007, Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes?, J Am Coll Surg, 205, 654, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.012 · DOI
  2. Sandor, 2008, Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair, Tissue Eng Part A, 14, 2012, 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0317 · DOI
  3. Patton, 2007, Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions, Am J Surg, 193, 360, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.021 · DOI
  4. Butler, 2005, Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications, Plast Reconstr Surg, 116, 1263, 10.1097/01.prs.0000181692.71901.bd · DOI
  5. Franklin, 2008, The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up, Surg Endosc, 22, 1941, 10.1007/s00464-008-0005-y · DOI
  6. Berard, 1964, Postoperative wound infections: the influence of ultraviolet irradiation of the operating room and of various other factors, Ann Surg, 160, 1
  7. Breuing, 2010, Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair, Surgery, 148, 544, 10.1016/j.surg.2010.01.008 · DOI
  8. Finan, 2005, Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair, Am J Surg, 190, 676, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.041 · DOI
  9. Luijendijk, 2000, A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia, N Engl J Med, 343, 392, 10.1056/NEJM200008103430603 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Helton, 2005, Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia, Arch Surg, 140, 549, 10.1001/archsurg.140.6.549 · DOI
  11. Diaz, 2006, Acellular dermal allograft for ventral hernia repair in the compromised surgical field, Am Surg, 72, 1181, 10.1177/000313480607201207 · DOI
  12. Ueno, 2004, Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects, J Gastrointest Surg, 8, 109, 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.09.025 · DOI
  13. Itani, 2010, Veterans Affairs Ventral Incisional Hernia Investigators. Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial, Arch Surg, 145, 322, 10.1001/archsurg.2010.18 · DOI
  14. Hesselink, 1993, An evaluation of risk factors in incisional hernia recurrence, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 176, 228
  15. McLanahan, 1997, Retrorectus prosthetic mesh repair of midline abdominal hernia, Am J Surg, 173, 445, 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89582-7 · DOI
  16. Korenkov, 2002, Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia, Br J Surg, 89, 50, 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01974.x · DOI
  17. Holton, 2005, Human acellular dermal matrix for repair of abdominal wall defects: review of clinical experience and experimental data, J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 15, 547, 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i5.70 · DOI
  18. Burns, 2010, Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction, Plast Reconstr Surg, 125, 167, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a6ed · DOI
  19. de Vries Reilingh, 2007, Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “component separation technique” versus prosthetic repair: interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial, World J Surg, 31, 756, 10.1007/s00268-006-0502-x · DOI
  20. Orenstein, 2010, In vitro activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by human biologic meshes, J Surg Res, 158, 10, 10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.033 · DOI
  21. Orenstein, 2010, Activation of human mononuclear cells by porcine biologic meshes in vitro, Hernia, 14, 401, 10.1007/s10029-010-0634-7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. McCarthy, 2005, Assessment of patient functional status after surgery, J Am Coll Surg, 201, 171, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.035 · DOI

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Itani, K. M. F., Rosen, M., Vargo, D., Awad, S. S., DeNoto, G., & Butler, C. E.
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
152
Issue
3
Pages
498-505
ISSN
0039-6060
DOI
10.1016/j.surg.2012.04.008
Cited by
249
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: The RICH Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.surg.2012.04.008
The paper
Itani, K. M. F., Rosen, M., Vargo, D., Awad, S. S., DeNoto, G., & Butler, C. E. (2012). Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: The RICH Study. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.04.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.