Cited by 85Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesEmbedded Systems and FPGA Applications

Designing efficient accelerator of depthwise separable convolutional neural network on FPGA

Ding, Wei, Huang, Zeyu, Huang, Zunkai, Tian, Li, Wang, Hui, Feng, Songlin·2019·Journal of Systems Architecture

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sysarc.2018.12.008

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The depthwise separable CNN work showed that 16-bit fixed point multiplication consumed 6.2 times less energy than 32-bit floating point, with a small accuracy loss of 0.5%.

    “Based on the research, their experimental work showed that 16-bit fixed point multiplication consumed 6.2 times less energy than the 32-bit floating point, with a small accuracy loss of 0.5%.”
  • The depthwise separable CNN design could improve performance times by up to 17.6 times faster than CPU while using 29.4 times less energy than GPU for a 32 × 32 × 3 image size.

    “The work concluded that the design could improve performance times by up to 17.6 times faster than CPU while using 29.4 times less energy than GPU for a 32 × 32 × 3 image size [24].”
  • A depthwise separable convolution neural network on FPGA reduces the number of model parameters and improves calculation speeds, making it widely used in mobile edge computing applications.

    “In the research [24], a depthwise separable convolution neural network on FPGA is being reviewed due to its ability to reduce the number of model parameters and improve calculation speeds, which makes it widely used in mobile edge computing applications such as Xception [25] and MobileNet [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, W., Huang, Z., Huang, Z., Tian, L., Wang, H., & Feng, S.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Hui
Venue
Journal of Systems Architecture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
97
Pages
278-286
ISSN
1383-7621 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907579173
Cited by
85
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Systems Architecture (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (18511111302)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (184131KYSB20160018)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Embedded Systems and FPGA Applications
Keywords
depthwise separable convolution, FPGA accelerator, pipelined architecture, double buffering, memory channels, matrix multiplication, mobile edge computing, low-power inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review