The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics without velocity measurements and with input constraints
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 1×
“Consensus algorithms for single-integrator kinematics have been widely studied in the literature, [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] to name a few, and several interesting results have been obtained using properties from graph theory.”
MethodConsensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 1×
“Consensus algorithms have received great interest in the control community, leading to several results that have been applied to a variety of problems related to the cooperative control of multi-vehicle systems such as flocking, rendezvous and formation control (see [1] [2] and references therein).”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Flocking for Multi-Agent Dynamic Systems: Algorithms and Theory
Olfati-Saber, R. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2005.864190 · Cited by 5,037
Information Flow and Cooperative Control of Vehicle Formations
Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834433 · Cited by 4,579
Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control
(2007) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2007.338264 · Cited by 3,156
Distributed multi‐vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange
Ren, W., & Atkins, E. (2007) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1147 · Cited by 1,484
Flocking in Fixed and Switching Networks
Tanner, H. G., Jadbabaie, A., & Pappas, G. J. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.895948 · Cited by 1,431
On Consensus Algorithms for Double-Integrator Dynamics
Ren, W. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.924961 · Cited by 1,413
A decentralized approach to formation maneuvers
Lawton, J. R. T., Beard, R. W., & Young, B. J. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/tra.2003.819598 · Cited by 1,060
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdessameud, A., & Tayebi, A.
- Venue
- Systems & Control Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 812-821
- ISSN
- 0167-6911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145192525
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 21.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics without velocity measurements and with input constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.06.019
- The paper
- Abdessameud, A., & Tayebi, A. (2010). On consensus algorithms for double-integrator dynamics without velocity measurements and with input constraints. Systems & Control Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.06.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
