The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flocking for Multi-Agent Dynamic Systems: Algorithms and Theory
Abstract
In this paper, we present a theoretical framework for design and analysis of distributed flocking algorithms. Two cases of flocking in free-space and presence of multiple obstacles are considered. We present three flocking algorithms: two for free-flocking and one for constrained flocking. A comprehensive analysis of the first two algorithms is provided. We demonstrate the first algorithm embodies all three rules of Reynolds. This is a formal approach to extraction of interaction rules that lead to the emergence of collective behavior. We show that the first algorithm generically leads to regular fragmentation, whereas the second and third algorithms both lead to flocking. A systematic method is provided for construction of cost functions (or collective potentials) for flocking. These collective potentials penalize deviation from a class of lattice-shape objects called /spl alpha/-lattices. We use a multi-species framework for construction of collective potentials that consist of flock-members, or /spl alpha/-agents, and virtual agents associated with /spl alpha/-agents called /spl beta/- and /spl gamma/-agents. We show that migration of flocks can be performed using a peer-to-peer network of agents, i.e., "flocks need no leaders." A "universal" definition of flocking for particle systems with similarities to Lyapunov stability is given. Several simulation results are provided that demonstrate performing 2-D and 3-D flocking, split/rejoin maneuver, and squeezing maneuver for hundreds of agents using the proposed algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Self-citationConsensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522
Self-citationCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots
Khatib, O. (1986) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498600500106 · Cited by 7,894
Consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents
Saber, R. O., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003. · doi:10.1109/acc.2003.1239709 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522
Self-citationVicsek, T., & Zafeiris, A. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,923
Xiao, F., & Wang, L. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.929381 · Cited by 734
Hou, Z.-G., Cheng, L., & Tan, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2007810 · Cited by 668
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Olfati-Saber, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401-420
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105850748
- Cited by
- 5,037
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 215.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flocking for Multi-Agent Dynamic Systems: Algorithms and Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2005.864190
- The paper
- Olfati-Saber, R. (2006). Flocking for Multi-Agent Dynamic Systems: Algorithms and Theory. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2005.864190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.