The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the consensus and bipartite consensus in high-order multi-agent dynamical systems with antagonistic interactions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 1×
“However, a decade ago, thanks to milestone contributions such as [10, 16, 18, 22, 23, 24, 26], a wide stream of literature on these topics started and flourished.”
BackgroundConsensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 2×
“However, a decade ago, thanks to milestone contributions such as [10, 16, 18, 22, 23, 24, 26], a wide stream of literature on these topics started and flourished.”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks
Mesbahi, M., & Egerstedt, M. (2010) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400835355 · Cited by 2,897 · cited 1×
“…formulated as that of a group of agents exchanging information with the objective of reaching a common decision, a consensus, by resorting to distributed algorithms that make use of the information that each agent collects from neighboring agents (see, e.g. [2, 11, 12, 15, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27].”
Background
Cited by
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Interval Bipartite Consensus of Networked Agents Associated With Signed Digraphs
Meng, D., Du, M., & Jia, Y. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2016.2528539 · Cited by 401
A survey on recent advances in distributed sampled-data cooperative control of multi-agent systems
Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Ding, D., Zhang, X.-M., & Ning, B. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.10.008 · Cited by 389
On the Bipartite Consensus for Generic Linear Multiagent Systems With Input Saturation
Qin, J., Fu, W., Zheng, W. X., & Gao, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2016.2612482 · Cited by 373
Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Hostile Camps: Consensus vs. Polarization
Proskurnikov, A. V., Matveev, A. S., & Cao, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2015.2471655 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Valcher, M. E., & Misra, P.
- Venue
- Systems & Control Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 94-103
- ISSN
- 0167-6911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075175322
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 41.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the consensus and bipartite consensus in high-order multi-agent dynamical systems with antagonistic interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sysconle.2014.01.006
- The paper
- Valcher, M. E., & Misra, P. (2014). On the consensus and bipartite consensus in high-order multi-agent dynamical systems with antagonistic interactions. Systems & Control Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2014.01.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
